An Imperceptible Watermarking Scheme for Medical Image Tamper Detection

An Imperceptible Watermarking Scheme for Medical Image Tamper Detection

Abdallah Soualmi, Adel Alti, Lamri Laouamer
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 18
DOI: 10.4018/IJISP.2022010102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

One of the important issues in telemedicine field refers to an advanced secure communication. Digital image watermarking is an ideal solution since it protects the electronic patient information’s from unauthorized access. This paper presents a novel blind fragile-based image watermarking scheme in spatial domain that merges Speed Up Robust Features (SURF) descriptor with the well-known Weber Descriptors (WDs) and Arnold algorithm. It provides a good way for enhancing the image quality and time complexity for medical data integrity. Firstly, the watermark image is shuffled using Arnold chaotic map. Secondly, the SURF technique is practiced to Region of Interest (ROI) of the medical image and then the blocks around the SURF points are selected to insert the watermark. Finally, the watermark is encrusted and extracted using WDs. Experimental results show good image fidelity with the shortest execution time to ensure medical images integrity.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

The world has witnessed an improvement in human healthcare conditions in recent years, due to continuous technological advances to improve patient safety by identifying early patient risks. However, healthcare organizations are aware of technologies when it comes to unauthorized access across unsecured networks. Disruption of health status may violate the confidentiality of sensitive secret information.

Digital watermarking techniques have emerged in recent years to contribute on security issues regarding confidentiality and integrity of medical images. A watermark can be embedded into a host image (Singh et al., 2019) to ensure image protection, content authentication, and integrity (Molina-Garcia et al., 2020; Akhtarkavan et al., 2020). Image watermarking can be classified as robust, semi-fragile, or fragile (Liu et al., 2019; Hsu et al., 2020; Ortiz et al., 2019). The robust approaches are often used for ownership proofing where the embedded watermark should be super tough against any attempt to delete it (Nejati et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2017). In semi-fragile approaches, the watermark must deal with at least minor attacks (Hurrah et al., 2020), unlike fragile approaches where the watermark is braked after undergoing any operation (Prasad et al., 2020). Fragile and semi-fragile techniques can be used for data integrity and authenticity (Yu et al., 2019; Borah et al., 2020). Additionally, the image watermarking techniques could be classified as blind (Li et al., 2020), where the receiver could extract the embedded watermark without requiring the original watermark or the host image, Semi-blind (Horng et al., 2014) and non-blind (Li et al., 2020) where respectively the embedded watermark, host image are required to extract the watermark.

Several watermarking methods have been proposed (Haghighi et al., 2019; Molina-Garcia et al., 2020; Akhtarkavan et al., 2020; Hurrah et al., 2020; Gull et al., 2020; Bhalerao et al., 2020). Each one has its advantages and drawbacks. The study and analysis of several methods have indicated that they should be used in a secure and imperceptible manner with low computational complexity. At the same time, the receiver could check if the embedded watermarked image was altered during transmission. In healthcare, any alteration on the image content presents a serious concern due to the sensitive information in medical images; even a smooth alteration will incite incorrect interpretation from the physician. Medical images have specific features compared to other kind of images such as: less texture. We need to constantly consider the importance of each pixel in medical interpretation to achieve correct medical interpretation.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 18: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 17: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2007)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing