Digital Dome versus Desktop Display in an Educational Game: Gates of Horus

Digital Dome versus Desktop Display in an Educational Game: Gates of Horus

Jeffrey Jacobson
DOI: 10.4018/jgcms.2011010102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

A visually immersive display can make an educational game more effective, if concepts are embodied in an information-rich space and the interaction/perception design exploits the egocentric view that the display affords. For example, ancient Egyptian temples juxtapose language and symbol in an architecture meant to be understood from the inside. In this study, students, ages 11 through 14, played an educational game based on a virtual temple. In an unstructured test in which students produced their own guided tours of the temple, those who played the game in a digital dome showed better factual recall (P < 0.05) than those who used a standard desktop.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

We live in a time of rapid advances in the use of communication technologies for education. (Dede, 2009; Mihalca, 2007). This includes virtual reality (VR), computer-based media which employ a three-dimensional virtual world. Students can interact with this imaginary space and things in it, psychologically “inhabiting” that world, as themselves or as some other personas (Winn, 2003; Slater, 2009). Researchers are working to develop curricula and learning environments that take advantage of the opportunities provided by these new media (Takacs, 2008). One key strategy is to cast the learning activity in the form of a game (Dondlinger, 2007; Squire, 2008; Anderson, 2010; Dede, 2009). Nevertheless, there is still controversy over whether the choice of media makes any fundamental difference in learning (Clark, 2010; Russell, 2000). If not, the educator’s choice of media should be an economic one. Either way, research is needed to determine what works and how to use it.

The purpose of this case study is to contribute data to the debate by showing one way that visually immersive display can support learning in game-like educational virtual reality. Visually immersive displays provide the user with the ability to look in most directions and see the virtual environment. The most straightforward example is the all-digital projection dome which can display a virtual landscape in a panoramic view up to 180 degrees wide (Lantz, 2007). The CAVE and similar devices also surround the user with a panoramic view, but they are much smaller, generally square, and usually focused on an individual user, providing that user with sophisticated interaction devices (Cruz-Neira, 1993). Another approach is the Head Mounted Display (HMD), a pair of glasses in which each lens is a video screen showing the virtual environment. The computer employs a tracking device on the user’s head so that it can show a stable view of the virtual environment in any direction the user looks.

In our study, we employed the Earth Theater at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History. Its main screen is a section of a sphere, providing a view 210 degrees horizontal by 30 degrees vertical. Specifically, middle school students played Gates of Horus, an educational game based on our Virtual Egyptian Temple (Troche, 2010). In Jacobson (2009), we describe in detail Gates of Horus and our experimental findings, which indicate that students learned from the game and found it enjoyable and engaging (P < 0.05). In this article, we describe our case study, in which individual students who played Gates of Horus in the Earth Theater had better factual recall (P < 0.05) regarding the temple than those who played the game on a standard desktop computer.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 16: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing