DocBase: Design, Implementation and Evaluation of a Document Database for XML

DocBase: Design, Implementation and Evaluation of a Document Database for XML

Arijit Sengupta, Ramesh Venkataraman
Copyright: © 2011 |Pages: 27
DOI: 10.4018/jdm.2011100102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This article introduces a complete storage and retrieval architecture for a database environment for XML documents. DocBase, a prototype system based on this architecture, uses a flexible storage and indexing technique to allow highly expressive queries without the necessity of mapping documents to other database formats. DocBase is an integration of several techniques that include (i) a formal model called Heterogeneous Nested Relations (HNR), (ii) a conceptual model XER (Extensible Entity Relationship), (ii) formal query languages (Document Algebra and Calculus), (iii) a practical query language (Document SQL or DSQL), (iv) a visual query formulation method with QBT (Query By Templates), and (v) the DocBase query processing architecture. This paper focuses on the overall architecture of DocBase including implementation details, describes the details of the query-processing framework, and presents results from various performance tests. The paper summarizes experimental and usability analyses to demonstrate its feasibility as a general architecture for native as well as embedded document manipulation methods.
Article Preview
Top

Motivation

The growth of electronic documents in the Internet era has been phenomenal. In early studies by Lawrence and Giles (1998, 1999) the approximate size of the web was reported to be about 320 million in 1997 and had grown to 800 million by 1999. With the explosive growth of the Internet that is understood to double about every five years following Moore’s Law, it is hard to determine the current size of the Internet, one can easily assume that there over 10 billion unique web pages on the Internet. The primary markup language for documents on the Internet is HTML, but because of its layout-driven nature and its limitations for use as a format for document interchange, new languages are being developed and used, primary among them being XML (eXtensible Markup Language) (Bray et al., 2008). XML is also being used to structure data-exchange among businesses, e.g., through the use of the ebXML standard (Grangard et al., 2001). Further, emerging web services standards such as SOAP (Gudgin et al., 2007), WSDL (Christensen et al., 2001) and UDDI (Clement et al., 2004) all use XML for achieving their required functionality. Hence, it is not surprising that XML is a key component of advanced software development frameworks such as Sun Microsystem’s (now acquired by Oracle) J2EE and Microsoft’s .NET, and is the backbone of emerging architectures such as Service Oriented Architecture (SOA).

Use of XML, however, is not limited to the “back end” of systems. XML is playing an increasing larger role in the area of document management. For example, many academic conferences now require that the final submissions are submitted as an XML document. This allows the proceedings to seamlessly be converted to various presentations formats (HTML, PDF etc.). At the same time, it allows for the creation of a searchable repository of these articles for use in electronic document databases, e.g., ABI/Inform or INSPEC. Thus, it is not surprising that XML documents are playing a significant role in modern day libraries (Tennant, 2002). XML is also being used to transform the way financial information is collected and reported. Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) is a language to enable standardized communication of business and financial information around the world (http://www.idealliance.org/xbits).

With the growth in the use of XML, both in terms of quantity and variety of applications, it is important that techniques be developed that will allow for the flexible as well as efficient management of XML data and documents. In particular, there is a critical need to examine the issues surrounding the storage and retrieval of XML data.

With regard to storage, researchers have proposed techniques that range from storing XML documents using existing file-based systems (e.g., Gonnet & Tompa, 1987) to storing them in object-oriented and relational databases (e.g., Christophides et al., 1994). Native XML data management (Fiebig et al., 2002) has also emerged as a viable alternative to relational or object-oriented databases. From a querying perspective, the most common method for searching information in XML databases is using the standard released by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) - XQuery (Boag et al., 2007). However, given the popularity of declarative languages like SQL for querying databases, the jury is still out on whether a query language like XQuery can serve the needs of all constituencies.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 35: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 34: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 33: 5 Issues (2022): 4 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (1990)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing