Article Preview
TopIntroduction
Knowledge is recognized as a key resource for creating organizational competitive advantage (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995; Srisamran & Vathanophas Ractham, 2014; Sturdy & O’Mahoney, 2018). In organizations, each individual possesses different skills and knowledge (Sveiby, 2001). In order to gain organizational competitive advantage, it is necessary for organizations to be capable of utilizing and managing knowledge (Alavi & Leidner, 2001; Grant, 1996; Nonaka & Konno, 1998). Knowledge management has therefore become the foundation for the development of systematic approaches in managing and leveraging knowledge in organizations (Alavi & Leidner, 2001; Au & Fung, 2019).
Knowledge transfer is one of the key knowledge management processes and is crucial for organizational competence (Gupta & Govindarajan, 2000; Nguyen & Islam, 2018; Park, Howard, & Gomulya, 2018). As knowledge can reside in individuals (i.e. organizational members), transfer of knowledge can be achieved between individuals in organizations (Sveiby, 2001). In other words, knowledge can be transferred from a knowledge source to a knowledge recipient. Knowledge source and knowledge recipient are two main roles in knowledge transfer (Gupta & Govindarajan, 2000). A knowledge source refers to an individual who possesses knowledge while a knowledge recipient refers to an individual who receives the knowledge from a knowledge source (Gupta & Govindarajan, 2000). In order to transfer knowledge from source to recipient, a knowledge source must be willing to dispose or share the knowledge. Moreover, a knowledge recipient must be willing and able to receive that knowledge as well. Knowledge transfer can benefit both knowledge source and knowledge recipient (Zhu, Chiu, & Infante Holguin-Veras, 2018).
Nevertheless, one significant problem of knowledge transfer in organization is that, even though knowledge source has willingness to share his/her knowledge, knowledge recipient might not gain the knowledge received from the knowledge source. Sussman and Siegal (2003) mentioned that knowledge cannot be successfully transferred from a knowledge source to a knowledge recipient unless that knowledge is learnt by the recipient. This emphasizes the importance of knowledge recipient’s learning in the knowledge transfer process. Sussman and Siegal (2003) also mentioned that, for learning to occur in knowledge transfer, knowledge adoption is key. Since knowledge involves cognitive structures and processes, knowledge recipient’s perception of the received knowledge is also involved. The knowledge transferred from a knowledge source can be taken by a knowledge recipient and ignored by another. The knowledge recipient is likely to decide whether to adopt that received knowledge or not (Liao & Chou, 2012; Sussman & Siegal, 2003). The differences in knowledge recipient’s intention to adopt the received knowledge can have influence on his/her learning of the received knowledge. Therefore, it is interesting to investigate the impact of knowledge adoption (intention to adopt knowledge) and cognitive learning in the knowledge transfer process.
This study aims to find out the impact of knowledge adoption and cognitive learning in knowledge transfer process by studying the influence of knowledge adoption towards cognitive learning. Moreover, the moderating impact of cognitive learning strategy is also investigated. This paper is constructed as follows; first, the concept of cognitive learning, knowledge adoption, and cognitive learning strategy are reviewed. Next, the study’s research design and methodology is described. Then, the data analysis is presented and discussed. This paper concludes with theoretical implication, managerial implication, and recommendations for future research opportunities.