Adoption of Model-Based Testing and Abstract Interpretation by a Railway Signalling ManufacturerAlessio Ferrari (University of Florence, D.S.I., Italy), Gianluca Magnani (General Electric Transportation Systems, Italy), Daniele Grasso (General Electric Transportation Systems, Italy), Alessandro Fantechi (University of Florence, D.S.I., Italy) and Matteo Tempestini (General Electric Transportation Systems, Italy)
Volume 2, Issue 2. Copyright © 2011. 20 pages.
OnDemand Article PDF Download
Download link will be e-mailed upon order completion.
| $30.00 | Add to Cart |
DOI: 10.4018/jertcs.2011040103, ISSN: 1947-3176, EISSN: 1947-3184 Sample PDFCite Article
MLA
Ferrari, Alessio, Gianluca Magnani, Daniele Grasso, Alessandro Fantechi and Matteo Tempestini. "Adoption of Model-Based Testing and Abstract Interpretation by a Railway Signalling Manufacturer." IJERTCS 2.2 (2011): 42-61. Web. 21 May. 2012. doi:10.4018/jertcs.2011040103
APA
Ferrari, A., Magnani, G., Grasso, D., Fantechi, A., & Tempestini, M. (2011). Adoption of Model-Based Testing and Abstract Interpretation by a Railway Signalling Manufacturer. International Journal of Embedded and Real-Time Communication Systems (IJERTCS), 2(2), 42-61. doi:10.4018/jertcs.2011040103
Chicago
Ferrari, Alessio, Gianluca Magnani, Daniele Grasso, Alessandro Fantechi and Matteo Tempestini. "Adoption of Model-Based Testing and Abstract Interpretation by a Railway Signalling Manufacturer," International Journal of Embedded and Real-Time Communication Systems (IJERTCS) 2 (2011): 2, accessed (May 21, 2012), doi:10.4018/jertcs.2011040103
Export Reference
 Favorite | | TopAbstractIntroduction of formal model-based practices into the development process of a product in a company implicates changes in the verification and validation activities. A testing process that focuses only on code is not comprehensive in a framework where the building blocks of development are models, and industry is currently heading toward more effective strategies to cope with this new reality. This paper reports the experience of a railway signalling manufacturer in changing its unit level verification process from code-based testing to a two-step approach comprising model-based testing and abstract interpretation. Empirical results on different projects, on which the overall development process was progressively tuned, show that the change paid back in terms of verification cost reduction (about 70%), bug detection, and correction capability. TopComplete Article List
Volume 3: 2 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing |
| |