Article Preview
TopIntroduction
Police scholars claim that practices by police organizations are largely based upon organizational and environmental factors (Cordner & Scarborough, 2010; Langworthy, 1986; Maguire, 2003; Paoline & Sloan, 2003; Jones, 2008; Wells, Falcone, & Rabe-Hemp, 2003; Wilson, 2006; Zhao, Hassell, & Maguire, 2003). With the advent of community policing, the police are further required to be responsive and sensitive to environmental demands (Liederbach, Fritsch, Carter, & Bannister, 2007; Goldstein, 1990; Wilson & Kelling, 1982). However, the police have been continuously plagued by their inability to solicit inputs from the community (Skogan, 2004). Thus, through the years the police have implemented various strategies and technologies to get in touch with the public. For example, the police have relied on personal touch through foot patrols and citizen contacts in order to reach out to their clients (Cordner, 1997; Cordner & Scarborough, 2010; Wilson & Kelling, 1982). More recently, the police have been using technology to reach out to the citizens through the use of the telephones (Cole & Smith, 2011; Walker, 1984). With the introduction of community policing, police departments have reinvented themselves by combining personal touch and technology to solicit inputs from and develop good relationships with the community. Thus, police organizations have used Computer Statistics (COMPSTAT) (McDonald, 2001; Swanson, Territo, & Taylor, 2008; Walsh & Vito, 2004), crime mapping, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), linkage analysis (Dempsey & Frost, 2008; Collins, Johnson, Choy, Davidson, & Mackay, 1998) or other forms of computer-related technology to gather and analyze inputs from the community.