Though relatively unknown, the Differential Quadrature Method (DQM) is a promising numerical technique that produces accurate solutions with less computational effort than other numerical methods such as the Finite Element Method. There are different versions of the former method, so one can refer to a class of methods based on the differential quadrature (DQ) approach. This chapter provides systematic steps to understand DQ based methods: how they work, how to use and develop them, as well as exemplary problems. It is divided into two sections: the first provides fundamentals and theories related to the DQ approach, while the second presents the application of DQ based methods to three significant problems, i.e. free vibrations of a multi-span beam (a typical model for bridge decks and floors), time dependent heat transfer, and vibrations of a rectangular membrane. The main focus is on the application of the method to space-time domains as a whole, an issue not well covered by the current literature.
A variety of numerical methods are available for solving problems in science and engineering, when analytical solutions (so-called closed-form solutions) cannot be achieved. Numerical methods are part of the field called scientific computing, which can be defined as (Golub and Ortega, 1992, p. 2):
“The collection of tools, techniques, and theories required to solve on a computer mathematical models of problems in science and engineering”.
Mathematical models very often take the form of differential equations, with initial and/or boundary conditions. The variables of the problem may depend on time and/or n-space coordinates respectively (in this latter case the problem is called n-dimensional, where n=1,2,3 usually). For example, a boundary condition can represent restraints i.e. the supports of the multi-span beam (see the first example in the final section) and an initial condition can be the initial heat profile in the time-dependent problem of heat transfer (see the second example in the final section).
Numerical computations are affected by several types of error, rounding errors are due to machine precision. Discretization errors are created when the “continuous” problem domain is substituted by a “discrete” one. The convergence error is due to the iterative nature of some numerical methods, where a finite sequence of approximations to a solution is generated. An acceptable degree of error depends on the problem being solved: for many problems in industry or engineering three digit accuracy is quite acceptable.
Discretization is the core of almost all the numerical methods (including the methods discussed in this chapter), by introducing a set of points into the problem or computational spatial domain (i.e. where the solution will be computed). These points, often equally spaced, can have different names, e.g. grid points, in the Finite Difference Method (FDM), collocation points in the collocation methods or nodes in the Finite Element Method (FEM). Choosing the points in the computational domain is achieved by constructing the approximate solution of the values at these points. This has the benefit of converting the differential equations into an algebraic system of equations that can be easily solved on a computer.
Replacing the differential equations with an algebraic system of equations can be done by approximating the derivatives of the unknown function (the solution of the problem) by formulas based on the values of the function itself at discrete points and is generally achieved in a systematic way (e.g in FDM) or by using polynomials which interpolate the function at the given points (e.g. FEM or collocation methods). How these interpolating polynomials are chosen and used is the main difference between some numerical methods. In collocation methods a finite-dimensional space of candidate solutions (usually, polynomials up to a certain degree) are chosen, so that the solution satisfies the given equation at the collocation points. The FEM approximates the solution as a linear combination of piecewise functions (usually, polynomials), that are nonzero on small sub-domains. In fact, the basic idea of FEM is to divide the spatial domain of the problem into smaller parts (or sub-domains) called finite elements or elements, connected by points called nodes, giving a topological map which is called a mesh, whereas the process of making the mesh is called mesh generation. The main advantage of the FEM is its ability to reproduce non-smooth solutions, in conjunction with the ability to handle arbitrarily shaped domains. For example, stress analysis is an important process in engineering that requires the solution of a system of partial differential equations that are very difficult to solve by analytical methods except for very simple shapes, such as rectangles; however, engineering problems seldom involve such simple shapes. For linear problems, the solution is determined by solving a system of linear equations, for a certain number of unknowns, which are the nodal values of the problem function. With regard to engineering problems, in order to obtain a reasonably accurate solution, thousands of nodes are usually needed. Generally, the accuracy of the solution improves as the number of elements (and nodes) increases, but the computing time (and hence the cost) also rises.
Key Terms in this Chapter
Boundary Conditions: The conditions that are satisfied on the boundaries of the spatial domain of the problem. The governing differential equation with the boundary conditions represents a boundary value problem (BVP)
Nodes: Points in space where finite elements are connected and where the unknowns of the algebraic equation system are computed.
Grid Points: Points are selected in the problem spatial domain where the numerical solution is computed.
FDM: The Finite Difference Method computes approximate values for the solution at grid points. To compute these values, derivatives are replaced by divided differences. This method can be useful for solving heat transfer problems, fluid mechanics problems and works well for two-dimensional regions with boundaries parallel to coordinates axes.
Meshfree Methods: Numerical method which compute the approximate solution without a predefined mesh.
Initial Conditions: For time dependent problems, the conditions that must be satisfied at the initial/start time. The governing equations with the initial conditions represent the initial value problem (IVP).
Collocation Points: see collocation methods
Collocation Methods: The approximate solution is produced by means of the values it assumes in some locations, called collocation points, where the governing differential equation is satisfied.
FEM: The Finite Element Method, computes the solution by piecewise functions being computed in smaller parts of the problem domain, called finite elements. A set of algebric equations are established and solved. It is employed extensively in the analysis of solids, structures, heat transfer and fluids. It can handle arbitrarily shaped domains.
MeSH: Topological map of the finite element spatial domain as discrete points rather than a continuous field.
Complete Chapter List
Joanna Leng, Wes Sharrock
Gabriele Jost, Alice E. Koniges
Ivan Girotto, Robert M. Farber
Rasit O. Topaloglu, Swati R. Manjari, Saroj K. Nayak
David Worth, Chris Greenough, Shawn Chin
Diane Kelly, Daniel Hook, Rebecca Sanders
Judith Segal, Chris Morris
Fumie Costen, Akos Balasko
Abid Yahya, Farid Ghani, R. Badlishah Ahmad, Mostafijur Rahman, Aini Syuhada, Othman Sidek, M. F. M. Salleh
Hubertus J. J. van Dam
Marc Hafner, Heinz Koeppl
C. T. J. Dodson
Marco Evangelos Biancolini
Joanna Leng, Theresa-Marie Rhyne, Wes Sharrock
Iain Barrass, Joanna Leng
Eldon R. Rene, Sung Joo Kim, Dae Hee Lee, Woo Bong Je, Mirian Estefanía López, Hung Suck Park
Joanna Leng, Wes Sharrock
Kerstin Kleese van Dam, Mark James, Andrew M. Walker
Jens Jensen, David L. Groep
Phillip L. Manning, Peter L. Falkingham