Fulfilling the Promise: Addressing Institutional Factors that Impede the Implementation of E-Learning 2.0Judi Repman (Georgia Southern University, USA), Cordelia Zinskie (Georgia Southern University, USA) and Elizabeth Downs (Georgia Southern University, USA)
Copyright © 2010.
17 pages.
OnDemand Chapter PDF Download
Download link provided immediately after order completion
| $37.50 | |
Available.
Instant access upon order completion.
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-729-4.ch003
Sample PDFCite
MLA
Repman, Judi, Cordelia Zinskie and Elizabeth Downs. "Fulfilling the Promise: Addressing Institutional Factors that Impede the Implementation of E-Learning 2.0." Collective Intelligence and E-Learning 2.0: Implications of Web-Based Communities and Networking. IGI Global, 2010. 44-60. Web. 24 May. 2013. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-729-4.ch003
APA
Repman, J., Zinskie, C., & Downs, E. (2010). Fulfilling the Promise: Addressing Institutional Factors that Impede the Implementation of E-Learning 2.0. In H. Yang, & S. Yuen (Eds.), Collective Intelligence and E-Learning 2.0: Implications of Web-Based Communities and Networking (pp. 44-60). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-729-4.ch003
Chicago
Repman, Judi, Cordelia Zinskie and Elizabeth Downs. "Fulfilling the Promise: Addressing Institutional Factors that Impede the Implementation of E-Learning 2.0." In Collective Intelligence and E-Learning 2.0: Implications of Web-Based Communities and Networking, ed. Harrison Hao Yang and Steve Chi-Yin Yuen, 44-60 (2010), accessed May 24, 2013. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-729-4.ch003
Export Reference
 Favorite  | | TopAbstractAs online learning continues to expand and evolve, new challenges emerge regarding the implementation of Web 2.0 tools and technologies in online pedagogy. The business model approach to online learning being embraced by many institutions may actually work against faculty who want to utilize Web 2.0 technologies to create e-learning 2.0 experiences for their students. Faculty and administrators need to recognize that differences in perspectives may significantly impact future directions of online courses and programs. TopIntroductionOnline learning is changing the postsecondary landscape (Cox, 2005). The 2008 Horizon Report, a collaboration between the New Media Consortium and the EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, identified several ways that technology is impacting higher education including the growing use of Web 2.0 and social networking, the evolution of how we collaborate and communicate, access and portability of content, and the continual widening of the gap between students and faculty regarding their perceptions of technology. These trends also portend some of the challenges that exist with regard to e-learning and specifically to the incorporation of Web 2.0 technologies into online instruction. Online learning by itself has proven to be a significant force in the reform of higher education as a result of increased access to courses and degree programs to students anytime/anywhere (Beldarrain, 2006). This rapid growth is challenging traditional instruction in higher education with the movement from teaching-centered to learning-centered and synchronous to asynchronous (Hartman, Dziuban, & Moskal, 2007). Course instructors must assume a different, broader role as the model of instructor as the center of the classroom is no longer effective in all situations (Grush, 2008; Levy, 2003). As e-learning continues to expand and evolve, new challenges emerge at the institutional level regarding implementation of Web 2.0 tools and technologies in online pedagogy. One such challenge is the growth of the business model of online learning which emphasizes control and efficiency, with less value placed on the innovation, creativity, and sense of community that comes with the use of Web 2.0 technologies. This chapter explores our belief that the growth of the business model of online learning may hinder or prevent the widespread development of E-Learning 2.0 communities. The objectives of this chapter include the following: - •
Briefly define the potential of Web 2.0 technologies to create E-Learning 2.0 communities of practice; - •
Summarize key factors related to the business model with regard to online learning in higher education; - •
Describe and discuss the disconnect between the “business model” approach and the use of Web 2.0 technologies within the online learning enterprise; and - •
Suggest a series of action steps for faculty and university administrators to ensure that campus online learning initiatives avoid “swapp[ing] the little red schoolhouses for the little online boxes we call course management systems” (Gary Brown, as quoted in Grush, 2008, p. 20). TopBackgroundTopDefinition of Terms UsedThe literature related to online learning frequently uses terms such as online learning, distance learning, and e-learning synonymously. For the purposes of this chapter, we are defining online learning as the widely used model that centers around the use of a course management system for synchronous and asynchronous communication between faculty and students. In the context of this chapter distance learning refers to the broader historical span of the field, dating back to correspondence courses and interactive television courses. We use the term e-learning 2.0 to indicate a newer model of online learning that incorporates the use of learner-centered Web 2.0 tools and technologies (blogs, wikis, social networking, folksonomies, etc.) as additions to or replacements for course management systems. Finally, the discussion presented in this chapter focuses on learning delivered entirely online, not on the use of online tools to support face-to-face instruction or on blended classes which substitute online technologies for parts of a face-to-face course. TopComplete Chapter List
Search this Book:
Reset | 1. |
Stephen Downes (National Research Council, Canada)
The purpose of this chapter is to outline some of the thinking behind new e-learning technology, including e-portfolios and personal learning environments. Part of t...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 2. |
Ann Dutton Ewbank (Arizona State University, USA), Adam G. Kay (Dartmouth College, USA), Teresa S. Foulger (Arizona State University, USA), Heather L. Carter (Arizona State University, USA)
This chapter reviews the capabilities of social networking tools and links those capabilities to recent legal and ethical controversies involving use of social netwo...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 3. |
Judi Repman (Georgia Southern University, USA), Cordelia Zinskie (Georgia Southern University, USA), Elizabeth Downs (Georgia Southern University, USA)
As online learning continues to expand and evolve, new challenges emerge regarding the implementation of Web 2.0 tools and technologies in online pedagogy. The busin...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 4. |
Robert Z. Zheng (University of Utah, USA)
The growth of online resources and the advancement of Web 2.0 technology are changing the instructional landscape and have significantly impacted the practices in ed...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 5. |
Marshall G. Jones (Winthrop University, USA), Stephen W. Harmon (Georgia State University, USA)
This chapter deals centrally with one emerging aspect of Web 2.0 for education, that of the increasing demand for real time and near real-time interaction among user...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 6. |
Daniel W. Surry (University of South Alabama, USA), David C. Ensminger (Loyola University Chicago, USA)
Higher education is changing in important and profound ways. New technologies are enabling universities to reach new students and create innovative learning environm...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 7. |
Jay Alden (National Defense University, USA)
The emergence of Web 2.0 technologies with its emphasis on social networking has presented an opportunity for academic institutions to take advantage of new tools to...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 8. |
Curtis J. Bonk (Indiana University, USA), Mimi Miyoung Lee (University of Houston, USA), Nari Kim (The University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, USA), Meng-Fen Grace Lin (University of Hawaii, USA)
A Wikibook is a transformative and disruptive technology that is finding increasing use in schools and higher education institutions. This new form of technology is...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 9. |
Chareen Snelson (Boise State University, USA)
The recent explosive growth of Web-based video has expanded the repository of free content that can be tapped into for e-learning. Millions of video clips are now av...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 10. |
Deborah Everhart (Georgetown University, USA), Kaye Shelton (Dallas Baptist University, USA)
Collaborative research teaches students critical knowledge management skills, whether they are undergraduates learning the basics of Web research or advanced scholar...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 11. |
Morris S.Y. Jong (The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong), Junjie Shang (Peking University, China), Fong-Lok Lee (The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong), Jimmy H.M. Lee (The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)
VISOLE (Virtual Interactive Student-Oriented Learning Environment) is a constructivist pedagogical approach to empower computer game-based learning. This approach en...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 12. |
Patricia Edwards (University of Extremadura, Spain), Mercedes Rico (University of Extremadura, Spain), Eva Dominguez (University of Extremadura, Spain), J. Enrique Agudo (University of Extremadura, Spain)
Web 2.0 technologies are described as new and emerging for all fields of knowledge, including academia. Innovative e-learning formats like on-demand video, file shar...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 13. |
Hyung Sung Park (Korea National University of Education, South Korea), Young Kyun Baek (Korea National University of Education, South Korea)
The purpose of this chapter is to offer practical ideas and cases for educational use of the Second Life® virtual world with Web 2.0 based technology. Virtual worlds...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 14. |
Sharon Stoerger (Indiana University, USA)
Schools based in the United States are trapped in a Henry Ford factory model of education that is focused on high-stakes testing. This model was effective when facto...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 15. |
Youmei Liu (University of Houston, USA), Shawn McCombs (University of Houston, USA)
E-Learning has undergone an amazing metamorphosis: it has changed from the delivery of individualized, static curricular information to the consumption and sharing o...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
| 16. |
Steve Chi-Yin Yuen (The University of Southern Mississippi, USA), Harrison Hao Yang (State University of New York at Oswego, USA)
This chapter provides an overview and development of sense of community and social networking; discusses the potential uses of social networking in education; and pr...
Sample PDF |
More details... | $37.50 |
|
| |