Leadership Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ & LBDQ-XII)

Leadership Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ & LBDQ-XII)

Rody Rodriguez (University of Utah, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2172-5.ch006
OnDemand PDF Download:


This chapter focuses on the most widely used and known leadership instrument: The Leadership Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ). The LBDQ, and its sibling the LBDQ-XII, have been around for more than 50 years and are still being used today. As a result, the purpose of this chapter is to examine the instrument by summarizing its background, and giving a perspective on the instrument’s reliability and validity. This was accomplished by looking at the LBDQ and LBDQ-XII’s long history, how it has been applied over the years, while focusing on the scales main factors of Consideration and Initiation of Structure. Additionally, many analyses of the instruments (LBDQ and LBDQ-XII) were reviewed to support the instruments robust reliability and validity. Lastly, the location and cost of the instruments were revealed in order for the reader to utilize the instrument under study.
Chapter Preview


Leadership has been a major facet for researchers for many years (Bass, 1990; Chang & Lin, 2008; Halpin, 1954; Hills, 1963; Inderlied & Powell, 1979; Katerberg & Hom, 1981; Kenis, 1978; Littrell, 2002; Sashkin, 1979; Schriesheim, 1982; Schriesheim & Kerr, 1974; Stogdill, 1963; Tracy, 1987). From government institutions (such as the military) to industry, to gender, to the clergy, as well as to athletes, the questions as to what makes an person an effective leader, what behaviors do skilled leaders exhibit, and how a person’s natural abilities can be fostered to become a leader have been aspects that researchers have sought to answer. As a result, several measurements have been developed and used to address this inquiry, but none more regarded and widely used as the Leadership Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ) (Chang & Lin, 2008; Halpin, 1957; Hills, 1963; Katerberg & Hom, 1981; Kenis, 1978; Judge, Piccolo, & Ilies, 2004; Littrell, 2002; Littrell & Nkomo, 2005; Littrell & Valentin, 2005; Schriesheim, 1982; Stogdill, 1963, 1974; Sashkin, 1979; Tracy, 1987).

Before the LBDQ was devised, researchers desired to determine the characteristics of a leader. One group of researchers sought to answer this very issue. The Ohio State University Studies (OSUS) was founded in 1945 by Shartle to address this query (Bass, 1990; Stogdill, 1974). During this time, there were no satisfactory leadership theories or way of determining leadership characteristics. At first, these researchers assumed that a person was born with leadership abilities. For this reason, they sought to identify traits possessed by leaders (Bass, 1990; Stogdill, 1974). However, this led to a dead end. Analysis of the prior research conducted by the group revealed:

(1) [T]hat little success had been attainted in attempts to select leaders in terms of traits, (2) that numerous traits differentiated leaders from followers, (3) that traits demanded in a leader varied from one situation to another, and (4) that the trait approach ignored the interaction between the leader and his group. (Stogdill, 1974, p. 128)

The OSUS researchers then decided that rather than trying to isolate specific traits associated with leaders, it would be much more efficient to determine the behaviors connected with leadership. Specifically, the researchers wanted “to describe individuals’ behavior while they acted as leaders of groups or organizations” (Bass, 1990, p. 511). Thus, traits took a back seat to while behaviors came to the forefront of determining what makes a person an influential leader.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Editorial Advisory Board
Table of Contents
David R. Seibold
Mihai C. Bocarnea, Rodney A. Reynolds, Jason D. Baker
Chapter 1
Yael Brender-Ilan, Gideon Vinitzky
In recent years, there has been an increase in academic studies that examine the advantages and disadvantages of using e-questionnaires in... Sample PDF
The Use of E-Questionnaires in Organizational Surveys
Chapter 2
Philip J. Salem
Most organizational research employs either quantitative or qualitative methods. Furthermore, users of one methodology often dismiss those who use... Sample PDF
The Use of Mixed Methods in Organizational Communication Research
Chapter 3
Benjamin J. Bates, Ben Birch
The development of digital computing and the growth of the Internet have opened up new opportunities to engage in online research. These online... Sample PDF
Online Research and Obtaining Human Subjects/IRB Approvals
Chapter 4
Audrey Barrett, Fred Galloway
The Nonprofit Ethics Survey serves as the only empirically supported survey instrument specifically designed for nonprofit organizations to assess... Sample PDF
The Nonprofit Ethics Survey: Assessing Organizational Culture and Climate
Chapter 5
Dan Lawson
The Life Styles Inventory, developed by J. Clayton Lafferty, uses a combination of respected psychological and managerial theories to help... Sample PDF
Analysis and Use of the Life Styles Inventory 1 and 2 by Human Synergistics International
Chapter 6
Rody Rodriguez
This chapter focuses on the most widely used and known leadership instrument: The Leadership Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ). The LBDQ... Sample PDF
Leadership Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ & LBDQ-XII)
Chapter 7
Self-Monitoring Scale  (pages 118-133)
Sharon E. Norris, Tracy H. Porter
Self-monitoring represents a social psychological construct of expressive behavior and self-presentation. The original 25-item Self-Monitoring Scale... Sample PDF
Self-Monitoring Scale
Chapter 8
Lijiang Shen, Celeste M. Condit
In this chapter, fatalism is conceptualized as a set of health beliefs that encompass the dimensions of predetermination, luck, and pessimism. It is... Sample PDF
On Measurement Instruments for Fatalism
Chapter 9
Jeff R. Hale, Dail Fields
This chapter presents items comprising three scales that measure servant leadership using three key dimensions: service, humility, and vision. The... Sample PDF
A Cross-Cultural Measure of Servant Leadership Behaviors
Chapter 10
John Kilroy, Corné L. Bekker, Mihai C. Bocarnea, Bruce E. Winston
This study presents seven scales for the seven beatitudes found in Matthew 5: 3-10. Separate scales were created rather than a conceptual instrument... Sample PDF
Seven Scales to Measure the Seven Beatitudes in Leaders
Chapter 11
W. David Winner, Rushton S. Ricketson
The Inventory of Leader Sternness (ILS) is a new leadership construct designed to measure sternness in an adult self-directed leader. Sternness, as... Sample PDF
Inventory of Leader Sternness (ILS)
Chapter 12
Jamie Swalm
Because shepherding is one of the oldest occupations of humanity, the metaphor of the shepherd as leader dates back thousands of years and is a... Sample PDF
The Shepherd Leadership Inventory (SLI)
Chapter 13
J. Alan Marshall
The purpose of this research is to develop a direct and concise perceived leader integrity instrument that is posed from a positive perspective. The... Sample PDF
Development of the Leader Integrity Assessment
Chapter 14
Measuring Followership  (pages 245-253)
Paul Kaak, Rodney A. Reynolds, Michael Whyte
The focus in this chapter is a proposal for a measure of followership with three dimensions: resistant follower, compliant follower, and mature... Sample PDF
Measuring Followership
Chapter 15
Hazel C. V. Traüffer, Corné L. Bekker, Mihai C. Bocarnea, Bruce E. Winston
The Discernment Practices Indicator (DPI) reports three-factors: (a) Courage, (b) Intuition, and (c) Faith with Cronbach alpha values of (a) .85... Sample PDF
An Online Measure of Discernment
Chapter 16
M. Gail Derrick
The Inventory of Learner Persistence (ILP) was designed to assess persistence in learning and specifically within the context of autonomous... Sample PDF
The Inventory of Learner Persistence
Chapter 17
Tobias Heilmann, Ulf-Dietrich Reips
The present book chapter focuses on e-leadership, reviewing and discussing the latest developments in new (e-)leadership conceptions, such as... Sample PDF
The Mutual Influence of Technology and Leadership Behaviors
Chapter 18
Orly Calderon
The instrument described in this chapter is designed for instructors of e-learning, for the purpose of giving faculty an opportunity to identify... Sample PDF
Preferred Features of Course Management Systems in Post Secondary and Corporate Online Learning
Chapter 19
Online Survey Software  (pages 328-334)
Jason D. Baker
The commonality among online instruments – regardless of discipline – is the use of online tools to administer the electronic measurements, collect... Sample PDF
Online Survey Software
About the Contributors