Social Capital Accounting: The Social Capital Protocol and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals

Social Capital Accounting: The Social Capital Protocol and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals

John P. Wilson, Sonal Choudhary
Copyright: © 2019 |Pages: 40
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7808-6.ch005
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Sustainability accounting has become a mainstream practice for a large majority of S&P500 companies, and this reflects global society's increasing interest and concern around sustainability issues. In particular, the United Nations published its “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” and 193 countries signed up to achieving the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 associated targets. The UN also called upon companies to help this process across their supply chains and developed a natural capital protocol for assessing and valuing environmental areas and a social capital protocol (SCP) for assessing and valuing human and societal capital such as skills, knowledge, wellbeing, shared values, and institutions. This chapter systematically investigates each of the 12 steps of the social capital protocol and identifies a range of benefits and substantial challenges which companies will face if they wish to account for their social impact across the supply chain.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Businesses must reconnect company success with social progress. Shared value is not social responsibility, philanthropy, or even sustainability, but a new way to achieve economic success. It is not on the margin of what companies do but at the center. (Porter and Kramer, 2011: 64)

In recent times sustainability has moved from being a peripheral ‘green’ issue to a mainstream one (Cochran, 2007) and, by 2015, 81% of S&P500 companies published a sustainability or corporate responsibility report (Governance and Accountability Institute, 2016). 2015 was also a significant year because it was the final year of the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) which were designed to improve the lives of the world’s poorest people. Furthermore, on 25th September 2015, the United Nations (UN) (2015b) built on the progress achieved by the MDGs and published ‘Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’ and committed all 193 signatory countries to achieving the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 associated targets beginning 1 January 2016, with the aim of reaching them by 2030. These much wider goals were designed to: “end poverty, protect the planet and ensure prosperity for all as part of a new sustainable development agenda” (UN, 2018).

This green agenda acknowledged that humans could only survive and prosper if the world’s resources on which they were dependent also survived. The UN (2015b: 4). stated:

We envisage a world in which every country enjoys sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth and decent work for all. A world in which consumption and production patterns and use of all natural resources – from air to land, from rivers, lakes and aquifers to oceans and seas – are sustainable.

To help achieve the MDGs, the UN had relied primarily on the support of governments and NGOs; however, with the SDGs it was evident that a broader coalition was needed to attain sustainability. The ambitious nature of the SDGs prompted the UN (2015b: parag. 67) to call on the support of businesses of all sizes: “to apply their creativity and innovation to solving sustainable development challenges;” and, to achieve these:

It is therefore recommended that your company considers the entire value chain – from the supply base and inbound logistics, across production and operations, to the distribution, use and end-of-life of products – as the starting point for assessing impact and defining priorities. (Global Reporting Index (GRI), United Nations Global Compact (UNGC), and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), 2015: 12).

To achieve sustainability it is essential that it is measured and reported upon, and Bebbington, et al (2014: 4) described how: “sustainability accounting and accountability have the potential to be tools in the management, planning, control and accountability of organizations for their social and environmental impacts.” The majority of research into sustainability and the supply chain adopts an instrumental logic which places economic interests above environmental and social ones (Gao & Bansal, 2013; Garriga & Melé, 2004). In particular, the focus is on how benefits can accrue to the supply chain by responding to environmental and social concerns rather than asking how a supply chain might become sustainable (Montabon et al, 2016). Companies which wish to operate sustainably need to consider the entire supply chain (Hutchins & Sutherland, 2008) and much of the research into sustainability in supply chains has focused on environmental sustainability (Wilhelm et al., 2015) with many companies adopting international certification e.g. ISO 14001 (2017); evaluating their carbon footprint; and implementing regulations and standardization (Klassen and Vereecke, 2012). Yet, social sustainability management is still at an initial stage, struggling how to understand, define and plan for social sustainability (Hutchins & Sutherland, 2008; Klassen and Vereecke, 2012; Seuring and Müller, 2008; WBCSD, 2017a). Furthermore, the majority of research from 2002 – 2014 into sustainable supply chain management did not consider the social dimension (Walker et al, 2014).

Key Terms in this Chapter

Social Capital Accounting: The process of valuing societal relations, institutions, and norms in monetary or other terms.

Social Impact Assessment: The process of analyzing, monitoring, and managing the positive and negative social consequences of actions.

Millennium Development Goals: Eight international development goals identified by the United Nations’ Millennium Summit to, for example, eradicate poverty and achieve universal primary education.

United Nations: An intergovernmental organization to encourage cooperation and international order.

Natural Capital Protocol: A framework to support businesses to identify, measure, and value their impacts and dependencies on the environment.

Bruntland Report: The official title of this report is “Our Common Future,” which was published by the World Commission on Environment and Development.

Social Capital Protocol: A process/framework to enable companies to identify, assess, and value the relationships, institutions, and norms of a society.

Corporate Social Responsibility: A policy through which organizations further social good.

Sustainable Development Goals: The 17 objectives established by the United Nations to end poverty, protect the planet, and support sustainable development.

Social Capital: The relationships, institutions, and norms of a society.

Supply Chain: The system and resources used to provide goods and services from origin to consumption.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset