Time is a very important dimension of any aspect in human life, affecting also information and information management. As such, time must be dealt with in a suitable way, considering all its facets. The related literature already considered temporal information management from a pure database point of view: temporal aspects (also known as temporalities) of stored information cannot be neglected and the adoption of a suitable database management system (Temporal Database Management System - TDBMS) could be helpful. Recently, research of the temporal data management area started to consider business processes, extending and enriching models, techniques, and architectures to suitably manage temporal aspects. According to this scenario, the authors discuss here some of the main advantages achievable in managing temporal aspects and consider temporalities in process models, in exception definition, in the architecture of a Workflow Management System (WfMS), and in the scheduling of tasks and their assignment to agents.
Processes don’t do work, people do.– John Seely Brown, Former Chief Scientist, Xerox
Inspired by the work of Hammer and others (Hammer and Champy, 1993; Davenport, 1993) on business process reengineering, modern corporations are increasingly adopting process-orientation and Business Process Management (BPM), as the fundamental rationale for structuring and managing their organisations. Integrating people both within and outside of the organisation into the enactment of these business processes is a crucial aspect of BPM. This trend coincides with the service enablement of enterprise systems, an architectural approach commonly referred to as the Service-oriented Architecture (SOA). While techniques for the composition and orchestration of enterprise services have considerably advanced in recent years, the challenge of integrating people into these automated processes has mostly been overlooked.
This applies in particular to service orchestration languages such as the Web Service Business Process Execution Language (Alves et al. 2007). While WS-BPEL promises easy integration of enterprise systems exposed via Web Services, it initially did not accommodate human-performed activities, an issue later remedied by two language extensions, WS-BPEL Extension for People (Agrawal et al. 2007a) and Web Services Human Task (Agrawal et al. 2007b). The purpose of this chapter is to provide a compelling case for people integration. It examines the common requirements and challenges of people integration documented in the literature. Given the priority of service enablement on the agenda of organisations, it proceeds to assess the capability of web service technology to effectively deal with people integration in a manner which is generically applicable.
Furthermore, we will explore the reasons why people integration deserves special consideration during business process design. Process-orientation and the division of labour have led to a high degree of specialisation in the individuals that make up an organisation. It is of paramount importance that in this context, the individual units of work that are part of a business process are routed to the right individual such that they can be executed on a timely and efficient basis. Indeed, many commercial systems have not markedly advanced in their support of the wide range of ways in which humans may wish or be required to interact with a business process. To this end, we will discuss patterns frequently observed in people-centric business processes and the implications of these when modelling human integration. On a general level, these encompass patterns observed in Process-aware Information Systems (PAIS) such as case handling, delegation, escalation and reallocation. Recent research has led to the classification of these requirements into a comprehensive catalogue of resource patterns.
From an industry perspective, WS-BPEL4People and WS-HumanTask constitute the state of the art in regard to people integration in a service-enabled environment. Although the specifications target a particular application domain, namely Web Services, they provide insights into the general, technological challenges of integrating people into automated business processes and provide a basis for an assessment of contemporary systems. We will examine the lessons that have been learnt in this area and explore the recent architectural and technological challenges associated with integrating human resources in automated business process solutions. In this light, the section introduces and discusses concepts underpinning WS-BPEL4People and WS-HumanTask. We conclude by giving an outlook on future challenges for people-centric process management that go beyond the technical integration of human tasks and put forward several recommendations that may help to improve the way humans interact with automated processes in the future.
Key Terms in this Chapter
Temporal Dimension: The temporal aspect, or temporality, of any fact or information. Several temporal dimensions can be defined, such as valid time, describing when the fact or the information is true in the real word, and transaction time, describing when the fact or the information is current in the database management system (DBMS).
Conceptual Modeling: A model which describes a part of the real world at a very high level, without considering any implementation issue.
Workflow Management System (WfMS) Architecture: A description of the several software modules, and their respective interconnections, which set up a complex software systems, e.g. a workflow management system (WfMS).
Temporal Database Management System (TDBMS): A database and its related database management system (DBMS) which can directly manage temporal dimensions of data, without requiring the developer to manage them explicitly. A TDBMS generally makes available some temporal dimensions such as the valid time and the transaction time.
Scheduler: A software module which sorts activities and prepares them for execution according to several criteria, such as the required skill the executor must own, the priority of the activity, the time that activity has already been waiting for to be executed.
Exception: Any abnormal event which may occur during the execution of a process. Exceptions can deviate the main flow of execution defined for a business process: expected exceptions can be managed by suitably defined exception manager units.
Complete Chapter List
Jorge Cardoso, Wil van der Aalst
Tiziana Margaria, Bernhard Steffen
Huy Tran, Ta’id Holmes, Uwe Zdun, Schahram Dustdar
Matthias Kloppmann, Dieter Koenig, Simon Moser
Chun Ouyang, Michael Adams, Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede
Kwanghoon Kim, Clarence A. Ellis
Manfred Reichert, Peter Dadam
Macello La Rosa, Marlon Dumas, Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede
Cinzia Cappiello, Barbara Pernici
Carlo Combi, Giuseppe Pozzi
Karsten Ploesser, Nick Russell
Dimka Karastoyanova, Tammo van Lessen, Frank Leymann, Zhilei Ma, Joerg Nitzche, Branimir Wetzstein
Hernani Mourao, Pedro Antunes
Guido Governatori, Shazia Sadiq
M. Castellanos, A.K. Alves de Medeiros, J. Mendling, B. Weber, A.J.M.M. Weijters
Diogo R. Ferreira
Kamal Bhattacharya, Richard Hull, Jianwen Su
Laura Sanchez, Andrea Delgado, Francisco Ruiz, Felix Garcia, Mario Piattini