The cooperative inquiry method is a form of research where participants are viewed as co-researchers who participate in decision-making at all stages of the research project. It involves two or more people researching their own experience of something in alternating cycles of reflection and action. Cooperative inquiry rests on two main participatory principles; epistemic participation and political participation. Epistemic participation means that any propositional knowledge that is the outcome of the research is grounded by the researcher’s own experiential knowledge. Political participation means that research subjects have a basic human right to participate fully in designing the research that intends to gather knowledge about them. Thus, the research is done by people with each other, not by researchers on other people, or about them.
Published in Chapter:
The Use of Story in Building Online Group Relationships
Stephen Thorpe (Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand)
Copyright: © 2008
|Pages: 19
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-863-5.ch040
Abstract
Throughout history, story has been a powerful and effective way to build relationships within groups of people. Professional group facilitators know the power that story can bring to the workshops and group sessions they lead. From within the membership of the International Association of Facilitators (IAF), a group of 18 facilitators came together to collectively research the benefits of story in online groups. There was strong interest in developing practical processes and techniques that facilitators could use in building and maintaining relationships in the online groups they work with. This chapter presents some of the findings from a cooperative inquiry the group undertook investigating the use of story using a variety of media including: e-mail, audio, telephone, video and Web conferencing, instant messaging, chat, blogging, and online surveys. Our investigations reveal that story can be a powerful means for building relationships between group members within online groups. The impact of disembodiment, restrictive feedback, unclear membership, and tolerance for technical difficulties are also detailed and some interventions are outlined.