This dimension takes into account the traditional demands for validity and reliability, associated with psychometric indicators. It recognizes that the assessment of competences requires the implication of a variety of assessment methods, in diverse contexts, by different assessors, as well as the adequacy of the employed strategies. This dimension is comprised by four criteria: instruction-assessment alignment, multiplicity of indicators, relevant criteria, competences-assessment alignment.
Published in Chapter:
A Conceptual Framework for E-Assessment in Higher Education: Authenticity, Consistency, Transparency, and Practicability
Luís Tinoca (University of Lisbon, Portugal), Alda Pereira (Universidade Aberta, Portugal), and Isolina Oliveira (Universidade Aberta, Portugal)
Copyright: © 2014
|Pages: 22
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4458-8.ch033
Abstract
The assessment of competences requires an approach where knowledge, abilities, and attitudes are integrated, naturally implying the resource to a variety of assessment strategies. Within this context, we have seen the emergence of what has been called by several authors, the Assessment Culture. Furthermore, Higher Education e-learning environments have also promoted the use of new e-assessment strategies. Therefore, it is important to reconsider the concept of quality assessment in Higher Education online contexts, and particularly how to develop it in the present learning landscapes. In this chapter, the authors present a new conceptual framework for digital assessment in Higher Education supported by four dimensions—authenticity, consistency, transparency, and practicability—each composed by a set of criteria, aimed at promoting the quality of the assessment strategies being used. This framework was developed based on the expansion of the concept of validity supported by edumetric qualities.