Perceived Barriers to Business-to-Government (B2G) E-Commerce Adoption: The Case of Government E-Marketplace (GeM) Portal in India

Perceived Barriers to Business-to-Government (B2G) E-Commerce Adoption: The Case of Government E-Marketplace (GeM) Portal in India

Mohammad Abdallah Ali Alryalat, Haroun Alryalat, Khalid H. M. Alhamzi, Anuj Sharma
Copyright: © 2023 |Pages: 19
DOI: 10.4018/IJEGR.323571
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

There are several studies that assess the influence of factors on citizens' intention to adopt e-government services in various contexts. However, there is a lack of research that examines the perceived barriers to B2G e-commerce adoption and develops an understanding of cause and effect group variables among them. This research is the first of its kind to extensively review the relevant literature in e-commerce adoption and assess the selected key factors which are equally relevant in the B2G e-commerce adoption. The authors apply a unique multi-criteria decision-making technique called DEMATEL to understand the nature of the barriers and collect data from eight experts having experience in B2G procurement in the public sector and government organizations. The data findings revealed that out of nine selected variables, five (i.e., lack of IT infrastructure [B1], lack of expertise and technical skills [B2], high cost of technology [B3], perceived information security risk [B5], and lack of awareness of government issues and legal policies [B6]) belonged to the ‘cause group' whereas the remaining four (i.e., organisational resistance to change [B4], lack of top management support [B7], low perceived operational benefits [B8], and unwillingness to adopt B2G e-commerce services [B9]) were found to be part of ‘effect group'. The theoretical and practical implications of the current study may enhance the understanding of B2G e-commerce adoption.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Electronic commerce, or e-commerce, has radically redesigned how customers and organizations procure products and services via the Internet (Yoo & Jang, 2019). The growing penetration of the Internet has driven the development, implementation, adoption, and rapid growth of e-commerce in the last two decades (Bai & Li, 2022). The contemporary platform-based e-commerce model is well supported by emerging technologies such as software-as-a-service, big data analytics, cloud and fog computing, the internet of things, artificial intelligence, blockchain, and extended reality (Bai & Li, 2022; Ilmudeen, 2021). These emerging digital technologies have provided the necessary impetus and growth opportunities for various e-commerce models like business-to-business (B2B), business-to-consumer (B2C), consumer-to-consumer (C2C), and business-to-government (B2G). At an individual level, e-commerce is revolutionizing consumers’ convenience, experience, and satisfaction with online shopping via websites and apps (Bilgihan, Kandampully, & Zhang, 2016; Lai, Ulhas, & Lin, 2014; Nisar & Prabhakar, 2017). There has been a significant increase in the number of consumers preferring to shift to online e-commerce marketplaces due to the vast choices available online, the ubiquity and interactivity of the platform, the rich product information accessibility, and the features for product and service personalization (Gunasekaran, Marri, McGaughey, & Nebhwani, 2002; Ho & Chuang, 2023). In addition, the disintermediation effect of e-commerce creates a greater incentive for consumers to purchase the products quickly and efficiently at a reduced transaction cost (Sen & King, 2003).

At an organizational level, e-commerce has led to a fundamental shift in interorganizational coordination among buyer-seller organizations for competitive sourcing of products and services (Chandrasekar Subramaniam, 2002; Dai & Kauffman, 2002). The other potential benefits of B2B e-procurement using e-commerce platforms include improved efficiency and productivity, transaction cost savings, increased effectiveness, and significant productivity gains (Claycomb, Iyer, & Germain, 2005; Kshetri & Dholakia, 2002). Research has reported that B2B e-commerce is growing faster than B2C e-commerce as leading organizations collaborate to transform the interorganizational transactions for e-procurement (Gunasekaran, McGaughey, Ngai, & Rai, 2009; Ho & Chuang, 2023; Kshetri & Dholakia, 2002). B2B e-commerce plays a vital role in improving the business performance of interorganizational supply chain management, which is an essential antecedent in gaining a competitive advantage (Baršauskas, Šarapovas, & Cvilikas, 2008).

The e-commerce evolution has also impacted government procurement, where government organizations have started leveraging e-commerce platforms to reduce transaction costs, gain operational efficiency, and ensure transparency (Skare, Gavurova, & Rigelsky, 2023). Public procurement refers to the purchase of goods and services by government organizations or state-owned public enterprises (Raymond, 2008). However, the procurement process of government organizations is strategically different when compared to business organizations because government organizations have different strategic goals (Purchase, Goh, & Dooley, 2009). Purchase et al. (2009) report that the strategic objectives in public procurement are focused on ensuring fairness, inclusiveness, accountability, transparency, equality, balanced public interests, and democratic values. Hence, public procurement by government organizations is a complex process requiring operational efficiency, transparency, cost-saving, and inclusiveness (Adjei-Bamfo, Maloreh-Nyamekye, & Ahenkan, 2019; Guarnieri & Gomes, 2019; Knutsson & Thomasson, 2014). In addition, government and public sector organizations are bulk buyers who are governed and controlled by auditors to ensure fair business practices and safeguard the public interest.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing