A Matching Approach to Factor Scores Based on Online Sponsored Search Auction

A Matching Approach to Factor Scores Based on Online Sponsored Search Auction

Xiaohui Li, Hongbin Dong, Yang Zhou, Jun He
Copyright: © 2018 |Pages: 20
DOI: 10.4018/IJSI.2018010102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

How does a search engine company decide which advertisements to display for each query to maximize its revenue? This turns out to be a generalization of the online bipartite matching problem. In this paper, search engines decide the strategy to allocate resources with an advertiser credibility factor under budget constraints. Based on the optimal algorithm, which is the notion of a trade-off revealing LP, this paper remains the competitive ratio as 1-1/e with an advertiser credibility factor. During the ranking in the keywords auctions, the authors calculate factor scores. The new arrival keywords should match to the advertisement which has the maximum factor scores. The amount of spent money, budget constraints, CTR (Click Through Rate) and a credibility factor are added to the trade-off function using in the authors' algorithms. In the long term, users tend to use the search engine with high credibility, which will bring greater revenues. The search engine will attract advertisers to bid on keywords and improve their credibility actively.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Internet search engine companies, such as Google, Yahoo! and Baidu, have revolutionized not only the use of the Internet by individuals but also the way that businesses advertise to consumers. Online advertising mechanisms used by search engines, such as Google’s AdWords, are essentially large auctions where businesses place bids for individual keywords, together with limits specifying their maximum daily budget. A search engine company earns revenue when it displays its ads in response to a relevant search query (if a user clicks on the ad). The process of online sponsored search auction is as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The process of online sponsored search auction

IJSI.2018010102.f01

Due to seeking profit essence, many enterprises bid for a good advertising position with a high price but sell inferior goods, so a lot of inferior advertisements are seen on the screen and the interests of the multiple customers are seriously harmed, which also effects the reputation and revenues of search engine companies. To improve the trustworthiness of advertiser and the ad quality, how to improve the auction mechanism becomes a very urgent problem to be solved in search engine companies. Obviously, if the correlation and credibility are high, then the internet users are more satisfied and they are more willing to click on the ads. In the long term, users tend to use this search engine, which will also bring more benefits to the search engine company.

The AdWords problem is a typical online advertising example. The Online allocation problem studied is proposed and analyzed by Mehta et al. (2005). Many advertisers compete to display their advertisements on a given web page which would result from a search query with in a search engine, or which would simply be known to attract traffic from internet users. An online advertising service aims at maximizing its revenue by choosing the best possible advertisement to display on a web page. The goal is to maximize the total revenue of all allocations. The bids of advertisers are different with limited budget. A question is how to maximize the benefits of search engines by AdWords online matching. The AdWords problem is described as follows: There are N bidders, each with a specified daily budget IJSI.2018010102.m01. IJSI.2018010102.m02 is a set of query keywords. Each bidder IJSI.2018010102.m03 specifies a bid IJSI.2018010102.m04 for query word IJSI.2018010102.m05. A sequence IJSI.2018010102.m06 of query words IJSI.2018010102.m07 arrive online during the day, and each query IJSI.2018010102.m08 must be assigned to some bidder IJSI.2018010102.m09 (for a revenue of IJSI.2018010102.m10). The objective is to maximize the total revenue at the end of the day while respecting the daily budgets of the bidders.

Throughout this article, we will assume that each bid is smaller compared to the corresponding budget, that is, IJSI.2018010102.m11 is smaller compared to IJSI.2018010102.m12 for all IJSI.2018010102.m13. For the applications of this problem, it is a reasonable assumption.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 12: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 11: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2013)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing