A Neurotechnological Study to Quantify Differences in Brain Activity Using Game-Based Learning: Gamification vs. Traditional Teaching

A Neurotechnological Study to Quantify Differences in Brain Activity Using Game-Based Learning: Gamification vs. Traditional Teaching

David Juárez-Varón, Manuel Ángel Juárez-Varón, Ana Mengual-Recuerda, Beatriz Andres
Copyright: © 2024 |Pages: 20
DOI: 10.4018/IJGBL.349219
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

This research delves into the comparative analysis of brain activity using gamification in the classroom versus traditional teaching. This study aims to employ neurotechnology to record and analyse the impact of active gamification methodology on relevant variables in the learning process within a traditional university education setting, presenting an innovative contribution to the existing literature. Neuroscience technology has been utilized to gauge cognitive processing of stimuli tailored for an academic experience in a university master's class. By scrutinizing brain recordings related to attention, interest, long term excitement, stress, relaxation, and engagement, the findings provide a quantitative assessment of key learning variables through brain signals. Gamification is the active methodology employed, and the application of neuroscience technologies facilitates an understanding of the variations in levels of brain activation among students, shedding light on the contributions of this active teaching methodology to the learning process.
Article Preview
Top

Literature Review

Traditional Teaching: Masterclass

The masterclass is a traditional form of teaching in which the teacher plays a central role in imparting knowledge and students act as receivers of information. The teacher speaks for the majority of the class while students listen and take notes. The masterclass has several advantages, such as the ability to convey a large amount of information in a relatively short time, allowing the teacher to delve into complex and challenging topics; it can also be a stimulating and inspiring experience for students. This method adds to the availability of information, the teacher's ability to control the learning process, and the objectivity of assessments (Soboleva et al., 2021). However, the masterclass also has some disadvantages, as it can be a passive form of learning, limiting students to listening and note-taking. It may be challenging to maintain students' attention for an extended period and can hinder student participation in the learning process.

The current educational landscape has required the incorporation of active-participatory methodologies into the traditional teaching-learning paradigm (López-Alegría & Fraile, 2023). Strategies that can enhance the masterclass include using visual materials (slides, videos, or experiments to illustrate concepts and make them more engaging for students), encouraging student participation (asking questions, organizing group work, or giving assignments), and promoting reflection (encouraging students to think about the concepts being learned). Consequently, the masterclass is an effective teaching method when used appropriately. Teachers must consider the advantages and disadvantages of this method and employ strategies to enhance its effectiveness (Jelovica & Alajbeg, 2023).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2011)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing