A New Approach for Assessing Learners in an Online Problem Based Learning Environment

A New Approach for Assessing Learners in an Online Problem Based Learning Environment

Houda Tadjer (Computer Science Department, University Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, LabSTIC Laboratory, University 8 May 1945 Guelma, Guelma, Algeria), Yacine Lafifi (LabSTIC Laboratory, University 8 May 1945 Guelma, Guelma, Algeria) and Hassina Seridi-Bouchelaghem (LabGED Laboratory, University Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria)
DOI: 10.4018/IJICTE.2018100102

Abstract

Problem-based learning (PBL) is an approach that improves students' skills in problem solving. The application of PBL as an approach of teaching in a class requires students' presence; such constraint cannot be fulfilled by all students. Therefore, it is important to avoid this problem by implementing an online PBL environment where students are grouped remotely and work together to solve a problem proposed by the teacher. This will guide the learning process of the learners and can evaluate their solution. In reality, we can find members who do not really contribute to solve a problem. From this point of view, the teacher's evaluation will not be adequate to estimate the contribution of the learner in the solution of a given problem. Therefore, it is important to think of another way for assessing learners' solution. So, the challenge is to implement an online PBL environment and to propose a new method for assessing students. In this paper, the authors present their system called Problearn. The developed system allows students to solve problems remotely in small groups. Furthermore, the system evaluates each student based on his behavioral profiles during the problem-solving process. To do so, the system must keep track of different actions carried out by the students. This system has been tested by students of a computer science department where they achieved very good results.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

In the last decade, the Problem Based Learning (PBL) approach has been widely applied in different fields such as medicine (Barrows, 1996), nursing (Shin & Kim, 2013), microfluidics (Bridle et al., 2016), engineering (Akili, 2011), accounting (Hansen, 2006), architecture (Bridges, 2007), etc. PBL is a teaching style in which a student is involved as an active individual in the learning process instead of receiving information from the teacher as in the traditional methods. In this approach, students are engaged to solve authentic problems with the presence of a teacher who plays the role of a facilitator (Hmelo-Silver & Barrows, 2006). The teacher has the ability to guide and help students to learn something (Chng et al., 2011). In PBL, learners can use previous knowledge in order to solve new problems and therefore can develop their skills through the search for a solution of a proposed problem.

It originally appeared in medical area to enable students to develop clinical reasoning and skills (Barrows, 1986). In this approach, students work on collaboration in small groups where discussion is important (Ng et al., 2014) to find a common solution to the proposed problem. The collaborative learning in the PBL process can be seen as more important for determining students’ achievement compared to individual study (Yew & Schmidt, 2012). Several studies divided the problem based learning process into three phases, started by a problem analysis, then the phase of self-directed learning and the last phase is called a reporting phase (Yew & Schmidt, 2009). In these environments, students work in groups of two or more to exchange information and ideas and find solutions to problems (Jagadish, 2014).

Problems are important concepts in the PBL and are usually the starting point of all the PBL processes (Hung et al., 2013). A good quality problem is important for successful learning in problem-based learning (Keshk et al., 2016). By proposing them, students start the process of learning. The problem should create a challenge that allows mobilizing the previous ideas of the learners and generating questions that lead to the search for new ideas and knowledge (Keshk et al., 2016). Thus, a good specification of a problem allows students to better benefit from their learning.

Over the last years, Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) have been strengthened and therefore E-learning has become an important mean in the field of education (Ruiz et al., 2006), which can help learners to learn without moving. PBL is based on the fact that the learners can learn by resolving problems; this learning method can be performed online. In fact, E-learning offers many advantages for both learners and teachers. Association between E-learning and problem-based learning method can give birth to the online PBL, which allows students in the same group to interact and collaborate with each other to solve a proposed problem. In order to ensure this remote collaboration, students can use developed tools to guarantee online communication. This latter can be asynchronous such as forum, e-mail or synchronous such as chat (Ioannou et al., 2015).

At the end of the PBL process, students must submit an answer or solution to the problem proposed by the teacher. The evaluation of this solution can be done by the teacher himself or done automatically by the system (Bey & Bensebaa, 2013). In PBL, the evaluation of the students is done based on the solution proposed by the group and concerns all the members of the group (the whole group). But, did all group members contribute in the same way in the process of solving a given problem? In reality, we can find students who did not really contribute in the solution and we can even find that some of them did not take any action. So, how to estimate the participation of each learner in solving a problem? And before that, what is the structure of a problem in PBL process?

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing