Adaptive Hybrid Semantic Selection of SAWSDL Services with SAWSDL-MX2

Adaptive Hybrid Semantic Selection of SAWSDL Services with SAWSDL-MX2

Matthias Klusch, Patrick Kapahnke, Ingo Zinnikus
Copyright: © 2010 |Pages: 26
DOI: 10.4018/jswis.2010100101
(Individual Articles)
No Current Special Offers


In this paper, the authors present an adaptive, hybrid semantic matchmaker for SAWSDL services, called SAWSDL-MX2. It determines three types of semantic matching of an advertised service with a requested one, which are described in standard SAWSDL: logic-based, text-similarity-based and XML-tree edit-based structural similarity. Before selection, SAWSDL-MX2 learns the optimal aggregation of these different matching degrees off-line over a random subset of a given SAWSDL service retrieval test collection by exploiting a binary support vector machine-based classifier with ranking. The authors present a comparative evaluation of the retrieval performance of SAWSDL-MX2.
Article Preview


Semantic service selection is commonly considered key to the discovery of relevant services in the semantic Web, and there are already quite a few matchmakers available for this purpose and different formats like OWL-S, WSML and SAWSDL (Klusch, 2008). As a W3C recommendation dated August 28, 2007, the SAWSDL1 (Semantic Annotations for WSDL) specification proposes mechanisms to enrich Web services described in WSDL2 (Web Service Description Language) with semantic annotations. Among others, one goal of these additional descriptions is to support intelligent agents in automated service selection, a task which is hard to accomplish using pure syntactic information of service profiles based mainly on XML Schema definitions. Typical application scenarios that require or benefit from a service matchmaking component include for example negotiation and coalition forming among agents and automated or assisted service composition. The first hybrid semantic service matchmaker SAWSDL-MX1 for semantic services in SAWSDL (Klusch & Kapahnke, 2008) adopted the ideas of our hybrid matchmakers OWLS-MX and WSMO-MX (see Klusch, Fries, & Sycara, 2009; Kaufer & Klusch, 2006) for semantic services in OWL-S, respectively, WSML.

However, SAWSDL-MX1 focuses on semantic annotations of the signature but not on the XML structure of the Web service as a whole. This is taken into account by the WSDL-Analyzer tool presented in (Zinnikus et al., 2006) by means of measuring the XML tree edit distances between given pair of services through XML type compatibility, token-based text and lexical similarity measurements. Besides, SAWSDL-MX1 combines logic-based and text-similarity-based matching in a fixed manner: It applies five logical matching filters and ranks service offers that share the same logical matching degree with respect to a given request according to their text similarity value. The hybrid variant SAWSDL-M0+WA does the same as SAWSDL-MX1 except that its ranking of services with the same logical matching degree is according to their structural similarity value as computed by the WSDL-Analyzer.

Finally, the adaptive hybrid matchmaker variant SAWSDL-MX2 computes three kinds of semantic matching, logical, text and structural similarity-based. In addition, it learns the optimally weighted aggregation of these different types of semantic matching to decide on the semantic relevance of a service to a given request.

One major advantage of this off-line learning is that it renders SAWSDL-MX2, in principle, independent from any given service test collection or future extensions with other matching filters. In fact, the configuration of any non-adaptive matchmaker such as SAWSDL-MX1 would have to be manually retuned by the developer of the matchmaker to reflect such changes.

Whether this adaptation feature may even improve the precision of non-adaptive variants in practice has been checked by us against the only publicly available SAWSDL service retrieval test collection SAWSDL-TC1 consisting of more than 900 SAWSDL services from different application domains. The results of our experiments show that all hybrid semantic service matchmaker variants outperform the single matching type variants (logic-based or text similarity or structural XML similarity only) in terms of precision, while all SAWSDL matchmaker variants available today, whether adaptive or not, do not significantly differ from each other in terms of their precision with respect to this collection SAWSDL-TC1.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing