Adoption, Usage and Efficiency: Benchmarking Healthcare IT in Private Practices

Adoption, Usage and Efficiency: Benchmarking Healthcare IT in Private Practices

Marion Sobol (Southern Methodist University, USA) and Edmund Prater (University of Texas at Arlington, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/jhisi.2011010103
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

In the past few decades various industries have adopted new information systems and supply chain management techniques. Unfortunately, although many industries saw significant gains, the health care industry—both large hospitals and small private practices—are slow to consider new technologies. According to the Health Care Information Technology Model (HCIT) and the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model, a necessary aspect in planning and applying new IT and supply chain techniques is the ability to compare and benchmark the organization. Whereas some research is available for hospitals (Malin, 2006), little work has been done for private medical practices. In this paper, the authors benchmark IT practices in terms of staffing efficiency and importance of usage to compare medical practices in the United States and Taiwan. The authors develop a set of efficiency measures for private medical practices that they correlate with types of IT usage, barriers to IT usage and extent of IT usage.
Article Preview

Introduction

  • “We've got 21st century medical practices but 19th century paperwork system. Doctors are still writing prescriptions by hand. So there's a better way to enable our health care system to wring out inefficiencies and to protect our patients. So medical electronic records is going to be one of the great innovations in medicine.” (George Bush, National Institute of Health, Cleveland, Ohio, January 26, 2005).

  • “According to the White House, most American industries are spending approximately $8,000 per worker for IT, but the health care industry is investing only $1,000 per employee.” (Roy Mark, January 27, 2005).

  • “Some grocery stores have better technology than our hospitals and clinics.” --Tommy Thompson, US Secretary of Health & Human Services (Turner, 2006).

  • U.S. healthcare providers can learn a thing or two about IT best practices by checking out other countries” (Sukel, 2007).

In the last few decades various industries have adopted new computer technologies, and especially technologies related to information systems. Unfortunately, “the adoption of information technology in medicine has been slower than in industry” (Sobol & Woods, 1999). While many industries saw significant increases in productivity, effectiveness and efficiency, and considerable costs reduction, which allowed them to become even more competitive, the health care industry—both large hospitals and small private practices—are very slow even to consider new technologies. Why?

Many studies have been conducted to look at the reasons behind reluctance to implement IT in healthcare. Unfortunately, while researchers concentrated their efforts on large hospitals, HMO's, and large multi-hospital health care organizations, the barriers for adoption of information technology in small to mid-size group medical practices have been overlooked. This is unfortunate because traditional research on Information technology adoption has been divided into three categories (Venkatesh, 2006). It has been studied at the individual level, (Venkatesh, Morris, Davis & Davis, 2003) group level (Sambamurthy & Chen, 1994) and organizational level (Fichman & Kemerer, 1997). Each of these can inform the other. This is especially true in the healthcare arena where private practices band together into large practice groups that have admitting privileges at various hospitals. Thus the potential interactions and conflicts between private practice IT usage and Hospital usage would seem to be an obvious one.

As Kouveles, Chambers and Wang (2006) point out “glaring inefficiencies which remain in fields such as Health Care, Transportation Logistics and Disaster Relief demonstrate the great and immediate need for supply chain management (SCM) researchers to find better and faster ways to translate research findings into firm behavior” (p. 464). Robinson and Malhotra (2005) find that even though philosophies of quality management and SCM have been researched extensively few have studied these agendas jointly. We propose here to combine benchmarking between two countries to search for more efficient ways to handle IT applications in healthcare.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2018): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2006)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing