Adversarial Training for Predicting the Trend of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Adversarial Training for Predicting the Trend of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Haishuai Wang, Jiali Ma, Ziping Zhao, Zhenyi Jia, Zhenyan Ji, Jun Wu
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 16
DOI: 10.4018/JDM.299560
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

It is significant to accurately predict the epidemic trend of COVID-19 due to its detrimental impact on the global health and economy. Although machine learning based approaches have been applied to predict epidemic trend, standard models have shown low accuracy for long-term prediction due to a high level of uncertainty and lack of essential training data. This paper proposes an improved machine learning framework employing Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) for adversarial training to forecast the potential threat of COVID-19 in countries where COVID-19 is rapidly spreading. It also investigates the most updated COVID-19 epidemiological data before October 18, 2020 and model the epidemic trend as time series that can be fed into the proposed model for data augmentation and trend prediction of the epidemic. The proposed model is trained to predict daily numbers of cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Italy, USA, China, Germany, UK, and across the world. Paper further analyzes and suggests which populations are at risk of contracting COVID-19.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

The novel coronavirus, also known as SARS-CoV-2, is a family of viruses that are named after their spiky crown and was first reported on December 31 2019 in Wuhan, China(Liu et al., 2020; F. Zhou et al., 2020). COVID-19 spread explosively throughout China and other countries of the world, especially in the USA, Italy, Spain, and UK. The virus has shown evidence of human-to-human transmission(Awadasseid et al., 2020; Kucharski et al., 2020). World Health Organization (WHO) has declared COVID-19 as a pandemic on March 11, 2020(Takian et al., 2020). Globally, as of 22 October 2020, a total of 41,104,946 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 1,128,325 deaths, reported to WHO. Comparing to other global pandemic in the history, such as the 1918 influenza pandemic(Morens & Fauci, 2007), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)(Seto et al., 2003) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS)(Hemida et al., 2013), COVID-19 is known as its 1) higher infectious rate; 2) longer incubation period, which various from 2-14 days after exposure to the virus; 3) higher fatality rate, especially for people with weak immune system or underlying diseases(Sharma, 2020). Moreover, some infected people are asymptomatic but still contagious(Day, 2020; Hu et al., 2020).

Although COVID-19 continues to spread globally, the experience of China indicates the outbreak is controllable if the government employs effective mitigation measures(Kraemer et al., 2020; B.-Z. Li et al., 2020). In addition, given the fact that the virus is highly contagious and there is no curative medicine or treatment yet, most countries formulated a variety of policy to curb the spread of COVID-19, including but not limited to Lockdown, Travel Bans, Testing Requirements, Social Distancing, Mask Wearing and Quarantine. Of note, better understanding of the possible future development of the COVID-19 pandemic will help with spreading control and prevention(Shiau et al., 2021). To date, studies are focusing on treatment options(L. Chen et al., 2020; Gao et al., 2020) and clinical symptoms(Gemmar, n.d.; Tian et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020), whereas only a few research have concentrated on long-term control and prevention. Given improved understanding of the pandemic trend may provide valuable suggestions on how to effectively control the epidemic spread and relieve the impacts to global economy and society(M. Li et al., n.d.), it is significant to accurate predict the epidemic trend of COVID-19. To this end, many approaches have been developed to analyze and forecast COVID-19. Those forecasting methods can be roughly categorized into two classes: prediction approaches based on CT scans and chest X-ray images, and estimation approaches based on the number of cases of COVID-19. The first category mainly adopts deep learning algorithms to analyze X-ray or CT scans for COVID-19 diagnosis. A CNN-based detection model was proposed to detect COVID-19 (Narin et al., 2020) and the model is trained using 100 chest X-ray images where half are from case group and half are from control group. The model was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation and achieved 98% classification accuracy. Another framework, COVIDX-Net, was proposed(Hemdan et al., 2020) to assist radiologists in diagnosing COVID-19 patients based on X-ray. COVIDX-Net employs several deep learning models and indicates the VGG19 outperforms other models with an F-score of 91%. In addition, Goze et al.(Gozes et al., 2020) automatically identified COVID-19 patients and examined the disease burden quantification on CT scans based on a deep-learning approach and achieved AUC of 99.6%. Wang et al.(S. Wang et al., 2021) employed a modified network inception model to extract regions of interest (ROIs) of sizes from the CT scans, and obtained 82.9% accuracy.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 35: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 34: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 33: 5 Issues (2022): 4 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (1990)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing