An Event Ontology Model Research for Environmental Pollution Emergencies

An Event Ontology Model Research for Environmental Pollution Emergencies

Sha Wang, Qiong Peng, Hua Liang
Copyright: © 2020 |Pages: 19
DOI: 10.4018/IJACI.2020100103
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In the modeling process, event ontology design pattern (EODP) is a solution to recurring the same error scheme. It can speed up the construction of event ontology and avoid design ambiguity. A general event model structure is proposed in this paper. In the absence of domain-specific vocabulary, the model structure can represent the most general event information in web text. Based on this, the concept of event ontology mode and the method of extracting event ontology mode are proposed, and the method is used to establish the environmental pollution emergency ontology mode based on shared vocabulary. Finally, the ontology model of environmental pollution emergencies was formalized by using description logic, and the domain event ontology model was implemented by using the event ontology model to verify its validity and conceptual consistency.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Environmental emergency is a frequent occurrence of a series of emergencies, it includes a variety of pollution incidents (such as haze, drinking water pollution, nuclear material leakage, factory sewage and other pollutants), and a series of social events were caused by pollution events (Such as group events caused by chemical projects, snapped up drinking water and masks, etc.), a great impact was made on social stability. These events are published through news reports or through Internet users in Internet applications such as forums, microblogs, and WeChat, these often lead to intense discussion by network users, they in turn will influence the real world in the discussion and evolution of the Internet. The Environmental Emergency Response System is used to collect and process information on various events, these are associated with pollution events from the Internet, and environmental managers and emergency response departments are assisted to monitor and analyze emergencies and take effective measures in a timely manner, it is very necessary (Oltramari A. & Cranor L.F., 2014; Donohue B. &Jensen M.D., 2018; Ray P.P. & Mukherjee M.,2017). The framework method (Liao Z. L. & Liu Y. H., 2009) or the network model (Shao Q. & Weng W. G., 2009) are generally used in the traditional environmental emergency alarm system to describe the emergency event information. The framework method is used to describe the incident, this has a good integrity, but it cannot express the dynamic process of emergencies, and it cannot formalize the knowledge, it cannot support strict reasoning. The network models are used to describe emergencies, although it can describe the state of event occurrence process migration, but the internal structure of the incident cannot be described, but also for the semantic relations between events (especially non-classification relationship) is also a lack of corresponding representation. The ontology representation of emergent event information is used and the reasoning warning is realized by the ontology method, they are new methods in recent years (Jihan S H &Segev A.,2014; Wang T.& Wang Y. Z.,2012). The concept of environmental emergencies can be classified. Based on the ontology formal basis of descriptive logic, the emergencies are achieved in the semantic level of uniform expression, so as to achieve knowledge sharing and interoperability. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly important to establish the relevant ontology in the field of environmental emergencies, it is an indispensable part of the pollution alarm system. However, the conceptual centered traditional ontology has many drawbacks in constructing the ontology knowledge of the emergency area:

  • 1.

    Concept Discrete Issues: The concept of emergencies and the participants, places and times of emergencies do not exist as an organic whole, so there is a lot of conceptual classification in the process of constructing ontology;

  • 2.

    The Traditional Ontology: Often easy to ignore the dynamics of emergencies, such as it is difficult to describe the sudden changes in events with the time and it is presented by the different states;

  • 3.

    The Relationship: Single between the traditional ontology concept, it cannot fully describe the semantic relations between events, it results in insufficient reasoning ability.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 6 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 5 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 2 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 2 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing