An Integrated Parallel Multistage Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio

An Integrated Parallel Multistage Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio

Faten Mashta, Mohieddin Wainakh, Wissam Altabban
DOI: 10.4018/IJERTCS.2021040101
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Spectrum sensing for cognitive radio requires speed and good detection performance at very low SNR ratios. There is no single-stage spectrum sensing technique that is perfect enough to be implemented in practical cognitive radio. In this paper, the authors propose a new parallel fully blind multistage detector. They assume the appropriate stage based on the estimated SNR values that are achieved from the SNR estimator. Energy detection is used in first stage for its simplicity and sensing accuracy at high SNR. For low SNRs, they adopt the maximum eigenvalues detector with different smoothing factor in higher stages. The sensing accuracy for the maximum eigenvalue detector technique improves with higher value of the smoothing factor. However, the computational complexity will increase significantly. They analyze the performance of two cases of the proposed detector: two-stage and three-stage schemes. The simulation results show that the proposed detector improves spectrum sensing in terms of accuracy and speed.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

The limited accessible spectrum and the inefficiency of the licensed spectrum usage demand a novel communication pattern to abuse the present wireless spectrum opportunistically. Cognitive radio (CR) suggests a new solution to overcome the underutilization problem by allowing an opportunistic usage of the spectrum resources (Yucek & Arslan, 2009).

Spectrum sensing (SS) is considered as the basic component of cognitive radio establishing. By definition, spectrum sensing is the mission of obtaining awareness about the spectrum usage by primary users in a geographical area (Yucek & Arslan, 2009). There are many SS techniques such as energy detector (ED), matched filter (MF), cylostationary detection technique (CSD), and eigenvalues based detection. These techniques differ from each other in term of latency, complexity, reliability, and the need for prior information. Each technique has advantages, disadvantages, and limitations. For example, the fast and low complex energy detector is paid by its low performance in low SNR values. In addition, eigenvalues based detection methods provide high sensing accuracy that is paid by high complexity and long detection times (Mashta, Altabban, & Wainakh, 2019).

Maximum eigenvalues detection (MED) technique provides better detection performance than the others eigenvalues techniques like maximum-minimum eigenvalues (MME) (Zeng, Koh, & Liang, 2008). In addition, MED technique is very accurate at low SNRs. However, it requires high computational complexity. The combination of ED and MED techniques makes use of the advantages of each detector in each stage as it exploits the speed of detection of ED at high SNRs and good detection performance of MED at low SNRs (Mashta, Altabban, &Wainakh, 2020). Furthermore, both techniques do not need any prior information about PU' transmission, and they do not require accurate synchronization. However, they are subject to noise uncertainty due to dependence of the test statistics on the noise power (Zeng, Koh, & Liang, 2008).

Multistage SS has been proposed in several literature in order to improve the performance and overcome the limitations of traditional spectrum sensing techniques (Gunichetty, Hiremath, & Patra, 2015; Anaand & Charan, 2016; Kanti, Tomar, &Bagwari, 2017; Latha, Gohain, & Chaudhari, 2018; Mourougayane, Amgothu, Bhagat, & Srikanth, 2019). The first driving feature for the multistage detector is the SNR. When the SNR values are high, the simplicity of the first stages is the main advantage. However, when the SNR goes down, it require more sensing accuracy. Therefore, more accurate detectors with a price of their complication are needed in higher stages to achieve better sensing accuracy (Hamid, Bjorsell, & Ben Slimane, Feb 2016).

1.2. Motivation

Traditional SS techniques exhibit performance degradation at low SNR and not capable of detecting different type signals. The detectors designed for practical CR must be highly reliable with a higher degree of sensing accuracy. We present in this paper a fully blind detector that does not need any prior information. The proposed multistage parallel detector is a low complexity detector with high detection accuracy. It can be used for reliable practical CR scenario.

SNR estimation of the received signal is employed to select the appropriate technique as a trade-off between sensing accuracy, and computational complexities. The SNR estimation process is accurate with low complexity.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 2 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 2 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 2 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 2 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing