An Investigation of Student Satisfaction in an Online Language Learning Course

An Investigation of Student Satisfaction in an Online Language Learning Course

Thach Ngoc Pham, Giang Hong Nguyen
DOI: 10.4018/IJWLTT.20210901.oa7
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

Online learning's application in the language learning process has become an important topic as the COVID-19 crisis has restricted in-person classes. This study investigates student satisfaction in an online language learning course at a higher educational institution in Vietnam. The study tested the influence of learner-learner, learner-content, and learner-instructor interactions; internet self-efficacy; and self-regulation on student course satisfaction. The effects of student background variables were also explored. Linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the contribution of predictor variables to student satisfaction. The findings showed that student interaction with peers, content, and instructors and self-regulation were good predictors of student satisfaction; however, internet self-efficacy was not a good predictor. Additionally, there were no differences in effects of gender and prior online language learning experience on student course satisfaction.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Online learning continues to grow in popularity. However, the effectiveness of online learning has been questioned, especially by educational institutions where there are inadequate organizational capacities to accommodate online learning and the use of educational technologies. There have been a number of studies on student satisfaction and engagement in online learning which are defined as the level of pleasure in participating in and fulfilling the learning experience in an online learning program (Dziuban, Moskal, Johnson, & Evans, 2017; Parsad & Lewis, 2008). Student satisfaction is dependent to one’s interaction with peers, instructors, and content; as well as technology, course design, and implementation. In an online course, student satisfaction also depends on the learner, particularly his/her ability to navigate the course components, search for information, and succeed in learning autonomy (Kuo, Walker, Schroder, & Belland, 2014; Triquet, Peeters, & Lombaerts, 2017).

In language teaching and learning, computer assisted language learning (CALL), which was introduced in the early 1980s, offered students the opportunity to learn languages in any context with computer technologies (Azizinezhad & Hashemi, 2013). Studies on English foreign language (EFL) learners’ and instructors’ attitudes toward CALL revealed an association between its use and user satisfaction (Hsu, 2017; Yükselir, 2016). This was mainly due to positive perceptions on language improvement and usability.

In Vietnam, the context of this study, a few online English language learning programs have been offered by both public and private organizations. TOPICA, an educational technology group, is delivering the TOPICA NATIVE platform for speaking practice through augmented reality (https://topicanative.edu.vn/). It applies practice-interaction-assessment-lecture-evaluation (PIALE) as an underlying methodology to support individual learners in their online speaking practice.

This empirical study aims to investigate student satisfaction in an online language learning course. Specifically, our study explores key predictors that influence student satisfaction. It also aims to examine the relationship among three types of interaction (learner-content, learner-learner, and learner-instructor), Internet self-efficacy and self-regulation, and whether gender and prior online language learning experience affect student satisfaction with the course.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 18: 2 Issues (2023)
Volume 17: 8 Issues (2022)
Volume 16: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2006)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing