Analysis of Knowledge Sharing Barriers in Sri Lankan Software Companies

Analysis of Knowledge Sharing Barriers in Sri Lankan Software Companies

Jayani Probodha, Shanmuganathan Vasanthapriyan
Copyright: © 2019 |Pages: 16
DOI: 10.4018/IJKM.2019100105
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Knowledge sharing is a vital factor for the success of organizations, mainly for the knowledge-intensive organizations such as software companies. This study aims to investigate the status of the knowledge sharing attitude and the existing knowledge sharing barriers in Sri Lankan software companies. The Theory of Planned Behaviour is applied as the basis of this study and assessed ten hypothesized associations among dependent variable; attitude for knowledge sharing (AT); and independent variables; motivation and willingness (MW), trust among individuals (TR), time (T), power relationship (PR), expected reciprocity (ER), communication skills (CS), organizational culture and structure (OS), leadership (LD), reward systems (RS), and technological infrastructure (TI). Measurement model analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis were used to analyse the data. The seven factors, which have been identified to have a potentially high significance with knowledge sharing attitude were then considered as the barrier factors, which indicate a high possibility to influence a negative impact on the knowledge-sharing attitude. Meanwhile, acquisition growth was identified to have the highest knowledge-sharing attitude, and the network growth was identified to have the least favourable attitude for knowledge sharing. Findings provide convincing evidence of lack of time, improper organizational structures, PR, language and ER as the main barriers associated with knowledge sharing in software companies. The study suggests some solutions to overcome these barriers and directions for future researchers to conduct their studies.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

Knowledge is considered as a critical organizational resource which leads to long-term sustainability and success of organizations. Achieving this sustainability and success requires a better management of the existing knowledge. For an effective and efficient knowledge management, it should have a sound focus on knowledge identification, knowledge acquisition, knowledge creation, knowledge sharing, knowledge storage and knowledge application (Vasanthapriyan et al., 2017). Hence, efficient management of knowledge is not possible without a proper process of knowledge sharing (Paulin & Sunneson, 2012; Andreasian & Andreasian, 2013). Knowledge sharing is the process which integrates and merges knowledge among each individual and teams in an organization by exchanging each other’s tacit knowledge, and explicit knowledge (Paulin & Sunneson, 2012; Andreasian & Andreasian, 2013). The firm that wants to create a knowledge sharing culture should encourage and motivate its employees to work together to generate new knowledge in organizations (Farooq, 2018). Software companies require a good basement of knowledge to stay competitive and growth due to rapid changes in technology (Kukko, 2013), which makes knowledge sharing a cornerstone for their growth and sustainability. Many researchers have identified issues that arise in software companies as of inefficient knowledge sharing (Ranasinghe & Jayawardana, 2011; Kharabsheh et al., 2016). Therefore, in order to improve organizational performance, knowledge should be shared in a structured way that the right knowledge is conveyed to the right person at the right time.

Knowledge sharing in software companies has been attained a considerable attention of researchers. Unfortunately, it is hard to find studies focused directly on Sri Lankan software companies and presently, there is a gap in the literature concerning knowledge sharing in software companies in the context of Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka is one of the most differed countries from other countries due to its immense cultural difference. Ibrahim and Irfan (2016) clearly specify Sri Lanka as a culture, which is completely different from other countries, mostly from European countries. According to Hofstede’s (Hofstede, 2011) cultural dimensions; power distance, individualism – collectivism, masculinity – femininity etc. are the difference in Sri Lanka. In addition, this difference affects the organizational performance in Sri Lanka. Even though some cultural factors are somewhat similar to South Asian Region, previous studies (Hofstede, 2011; Ibrahim & Irfan, 2016) prove a huge inequality among people in Sri Lanka even when compare with South Asian Region due to a hierarchical division based on ethnicity, religion, language, cast etc.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing