Automated ERP Category Configuration Support for Small Businesses

Automated ERP Category Configuration Support for Small Businesses

Klaus Wölfel
Copyright: © 2015 |Pages: 23
DOI: 10.4018/IJEIS.2015040101
(Individual Articles)
No Current Special Offers


Disruptive business models, such as software as a service and open source software, have made Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) packages and related software more accessible for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). However, the consulting required to configure an ERP to meet the specific needs of an organization remains a major financial burden for SMEs. One configuration task which is common to many ERPs is category configuration. With the help of automated category configuration support, managers of small businesses can perform category configuration on their own and reduce part of the consulting cost. This paper presents the design of a generic automation approach for ERP category configuration, its implementation and its application to the open source ERP package ERP5. The approach is based on similarity of example data, automatic vocabulary consolidation through Wikipedia redirects and (meta-) templates. The empirical evaluation through a laboratory experiment with one hundred test persons and a survey supports the validity, effectiveness and utility of the designed artefact.
Article Preview


ERP packages and related systems are said to enable organisations to manage their resources efficiently and effectively by providing a total and integrated solution for their information processing needs (Nah, Lau, & Kuang, 2001). Due to technical and economical restrictions, ERP systems traditionally have been focused on larger organisations. In recent years, however, a turn of the market towards SMEs can be observed (Deep, Guttridge, Dani, & Burns, 2008). Adam and O’Doherty (2000) show that SMEs are as likely to be interested in ERP as multinational organisations. ERP packages are being viewed as a key factor for gaining competitive advantage in the SME sector, and empirical findings confirm these expectations (Koh & Simpson, 2007).

However, Morabito, Pace, and Previtali (2005) identify a lack of human and financial resources, as well as lock-in risks, as major problems that SMEs face when adopting ERP technology. They often do not have dedicated teams for implementation and software maintenance and cannot spend as much money on Information Technology (IT) as large enterprises, which in turn makes them more vulnerable to the risk of lock-ins in ERP packages and vendors when requirements change after implementation.

Business models in which SMEs access ERP functionalities through the Internet could alleviate the SME-specific problems and broaden the ERP market (Adam & O’Doherty, 2000). Since a some years, Software as a Service (SaaS) has been associated with this kind of business model (Hofmann, 2008). By providing applications directly through the Internet, SaaS eliminates installation and update tasks, thus saving clients from maintenance work and reducing IT expenses by on-demand pricing (Wang et al. 2008). Another “disruptive business model” mentioned by Hofmann (2008) is that of open source companies. Open source systems are considered a viable alternative for SMEs as they tackle their specific problems. They not only help to save license costs, but they also prevent lock-in. As their source code is free to everyone, they lower the barrier for third parties to perform modifications (Campos, Carvalho, & Rodrigues, 2007).

Despite these promising perspectives, consulting efforts remain a financial burden for an ERP implementation project (Janssens, Kusters, & Heemstra, 2007). Although ERP systems are cheaper and easier to implement for SMEs than for large enterprises (Morabito et al., 2005), SMEs may face challenges in affording major consulting support (Kinni, 1995; Snider, Da Silveira, & Balakrishnan, 2009). Open source ERP packages help to save license costs, but implementation costs often far exceed the costs for ERP package licenses. Thus, the greatest savings can be achieved during implementation (Timbrell & Gable, 2002).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing