Chinese University Students' Metacognitive Strategy Use in Language Acquisition: A Flipped Learning Perspective

Chinese University Students' Metacognitive Strategy Use in Language Acquisition: A Flipped Learning Perspective

Jiahong Jiang
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 17
DOI: 10.4018/IJMBL.297974
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

Since the introduction of flipped learning, it has drawn much attention and enjoyed increasing popularity. This study attempts to investigate Chinese English majors' metacognitive strategy use in a flipped environment and the influencing factors of metacognitive strategy use. Thirty-five subjects were asked to study the assigned online course video lectures out of class and participate in activities demanding the application of acquired knowledge. Students' metacognitive strategy use and factors influencing their use were analyzed based on the data collected from written reflections, interviews, and classroom observations. Findings indicate that 1) planning, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, directed attention, and selective attention are students' main employed metacognitive strategies in and out of the flipped classroom; 2) factors influencing students' metacognitive strategy use consist of students' desired learning outcomes and group learning; and 3) students' self-control over learning pace in the flipped context further motivates their use of diverse metacognitive strategies.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Generally, teachers play a primary role in lecturing in the traditional university education in China, because lecturing is the main teaching method. Teachers’ off-line lectures are the primary source of students’ knowledge. This form of teaching has been widely studied in different aspects. Some researchers (McCarthy & Anderson, 2000) have reached the conclusion that lecturing may lead to students’ passive knowledge acquisition because of their superficial processing of information. Recently, the pedagogical trend has been promoting the idea of student-centeredness. Among the different student-centered learning pedagogies, flipped instruction, which was first introduced in 2012 by Jon Bergmann and Aaron Sams, has been paid much attention to and enjoyed a growing amount of popularity. However, due to the teaching and learning context in China, the test-based education system usually leads English teachers to primarily adopt teacher-centered and exam-oriented instruction (Mermelstein, 2015; Samir, et. al., 2020; Zhong, 2019). This explains why flipped learning studies on English acquisition conducted in China commonly demonstrate that many students state that learning becomes challenging when getting accustomed to flipped learning, which was not as secure and comfortable as compared with teacher-centered learning (Hao, 2016; Chen Hsieh, Wu, & Marek, 2017). Qualitative studies on flipped learning in this context are limited, so a greater understanding of students’ learning performance in the flipped context is useful for educators.

In flipped learning, students have access to their learning content out of the class and discuss it with partners or apply the out-of-class acquired knowledge to the new content in the in-class activities. The new inverted learning approach has aroused researchers’ interest in exploring its effects on learning. Up to now, scholars (Day & Foley, 2006; Ruddick, 2012; Azamat, et. al., 2018) have conducted empirical experiments investigating students’ positive perceptions of the approach and their challenges encountered in the process of its implementation (Talbert, 2012; Teimzit, et. al., 2019). Besides, the advantages of flipped learning (Adnan, 2017; Sletten, 2017; Tokmak, et. al., 2019; Zhong & Qing, 2019) have been broadly explored, among which the definite advantages such as learners’ learning flexibility and self-control over their learning pace have commonly been found. In order to gain the desired learning outcomes, students, guided by their own self-control of learning pace, commonly employ metacognitive strategies to monitor and regulate learning, such as deciding on the time, the place and the way they should handle the learning materials (Joao, et. al., 2018; Yilmaz & Baydas, 2017; Manganello, et. al. 2021).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 16: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 15: 2 Issues (2023): 1 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2022)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing