City Group Optimization: An Optimizer for Continuous Problems

City Group Optimization: An Optimizer for Continuous Problems

Yijun Yang (Beihang University, Beijing, China) and Haibin Duan (Beihang University, Beijing, China)
Copyright: © 2016 |Pages: 22
DOI: 10.4018/IJSIR.2016070101
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

City group refers to a collection of cities. Through the development and growth, and these cities form a chain of metropolitan areas. In a city group, cities are divided into central cities and subordinate cities. Generally, central cities have greater chances to develop. However, subordinate cities may not have great chances to develop unless they are adjacent to central cities. Thus, a city is more likely to develop well if it is near a central city. In the process, the spatial distribution of cities changes all the time. Urbanologists call the above phenomena as the evolution of city groups. In this paper, the city group optimization algorithm is presented, which is based on urbanology and mimics the evolution of city groups. The robustness and evolutionary process of the proposed city group optimization algorithm are validated by testing it on 15 benchmark functions. The comparative results show that the proposed algorithm is effective for solving complexly continuous problems due to a stronger ability to escape from local optima.
Article Preview

1. Introduction

City group, the sub-discipline of urbanology, first, is found by the twentieth century urbanologist, i.e., Ebenezer (Ebenezer, 2010). Until 1915, Patrick wrote a book “Cities in Evolution” and first presented “city-region” (Patrick, 1968). The “city-region” is defined as “conurbation” by Patrick, a chain of interlinked urban districts or metropolitan areas. In 1957, Gottmann used “megalopolis” to describe a chain of metropolitan areas along the northeastern seaboard of U.S. According to the research of urbanologists, they discovered that different terms are used to denote the concept of metropolitan areas. Thus, to avoid confusion, we use a constant term “city group” to express the same concept in this paper. By now, many scholars have researched abundant information about city groups (Peter, & Kathy, 2006). During twenty-first century, a quick population growth leads to the expansion of cities. City groups have drawn more people’s attention, especially in China (Yao, et al., 2006). With the fast development of China, many city groups, such as the Pearl River Delta, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region and Central Plains Urban Agglomeration, have already deeply influenced the public life. City groups have become common phenomena. However, we investigate the Engineering Index (EI) and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and discover that no one tries to utilize advantages of city groups to solve optimization problems. Therefore, this paper is written to study advantages of city groups, and these may contribute to design new metaheuristics.

The development of city group is an evolutionary process. The process can be classified into the following two stages. In the first stage, cities cluster together in a group. A city with more residents is deemed to have a higher population size index (PSI). A city has prosperous economies, excellent geographic positions and convenient transportations, naturally, its PSI is high. A city group contains central cities and subordinate cities. It is obvious that PSIs of central cities are higher than subordinate cities. Usually, subordinate cities that are nearer central cities are easier to improve their PSIs. Hence, the central cities are magnetic for subordinate cities. In this case, subordinate cities will be gathered around central cities as shown in Figure 1(a). In the second stage, cities are diffused in a limit area. Suppose subordinate cities have higher PSIs than central cities over time, and then the subordinate cities will displace former central cities. So the center of city group will change from the previous position to another position. New central cities will be surrounded by subordinate cities, thus the cities are diffused as shown in Figure 1(b). Due to the unceasing clustering and diffusion, a city group maintains the internal balance and development (Gregory, 2002).

Figure 1.

(a) Clustering; (b) Diffusion

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing