Comparing Object-Oriented and Extended-Entity-Relationship Data Models

Comparing Object-Oriented and Extended-Entity-Relationship Data Models

Bill C. Hardgrave (University of Arkansas, USA) and Nikunj P. Dalal (Oklahoma State University, USA)
Copyright: © 1995 |Pages: 8
DOI: 10.4018/jdm.1995070102
OnDemand PDF Download:
Available
$37.50
Current Special Offers
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In the past few years, object–oriented (O–O) conceptual data modeling has emerged as an alternative to the traditional technique of entity–relationship modeling. O–O modeling is based on the premise that the resulting models are easier to use and understand. However, most claims of O–O modeling superiority are not empirically verified. Previous studies in this area have focused on a database modeler’s ability to create conceptual data models from a written description, but the concept of understanding a completed data model by a database designer has not been investigated. Thus, this study explores a database designer’s ability to understand an O–O conceptual data model – the Object Modeling Technique (OMT) – compared to an E–R model – the extended–entity– relationship model (EER). The OMT and EER conceptual data modeling techniques are compared using three modeling performance criteria: (1) model understanding; (2) time to understand; and (3) perceived ease–of–use. Results of this study indicate that the only difference between the two techniques is in the time to understand – OMT is significantly faster for both simple and complex problems.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles
Volume 33: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (1990)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing