Considering Complexity in Simple Solutions: What’s So Complicated About Skype?

Considering Complexity in Simple Solutions: What’s So Complicated About Skype?

Teri Taylor (Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK)
Copyright: © 2014 |Pages: 18
DOI: 10.4018/ijss.2014010104
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


Video-based communications technologies are not new. However, with increasing drivers for efficiency and cost-effectiveness in higher education, the use of this technology is being explored for what have traditionally been face-to-face activities. This article conceptualises the intricacies of influencing factors affecting the performance of video-based communications in student support activities. Considering video-based communication within student support as a complex adaptive system, the author aims to illustrate how a multitude of intrinsic and extrinsic variables interact and impact upon individual experiences. Using an illustrative diagram, the article explores how psychology and behavioural aspects integrate with communications theory, technological experience, task objectives and social presence theory to necessitate careful consideration of individual need and purpose when planning for technological implementation.
Article Preview


In an environment of increasing reliance upon technology, financial and environmental drivers are leading technological initiatives aimed at increased efficiency and performance (Dos Santos & Sussman, 2000). LEAN principles are commonly being used to investigate improve efficiency of large scale practice (Kouzmin & Korac-Kakabadse, 2000). However, though commonly, a one size fits all approach appears to apply to technological implementation it is felt that individuals’ perceptions of new technologies vary considerably.

Whilst technological implementation would seem on face value to be relatively straightforward, it has been found that many assumptions made at the initial outset are often erroneous (Taylor, 2009). Within higher education it is felt that assumptions are made about the abilities and amenability of students to such initiatives. Assuming a uniform audience for a technological initiative ignores the complexities associated with human nature. For example, the myth of the “millennial” child, growing up with technology assumes literacy in all things technological (Oblinger, 2003). However, whilst children are taught to use computers as part of the national curriculum, this does not necessarily translate to competence with the tools. Mortimore (1999) uses the concept of the “cognitive apprentice” to illustrate the importance of situation in skills development; demonstrating that transference to a different context is not always possible. In addition, Mortimore recognises the role of relevance to the individual in motivating learning. Whilst young people may be highly adept at the use of Face book for social networking, translation to more formal use may not occur where relevance is unclear. The question is raised as to how often these assumptions underpin implementation policy without thorough investigation.

Whilst not intended to be the focus of this article, empirical research undertaken by the author illustrates how common assumptions negate the complexities of working with individuals (Taylor, 2009, 2011; 2012). In responding to institutional drivers, for decreased costs in the support of individual, placement-based students the author undertook a three-phase action research project aimed at establishing the fitness for purpose of video-based communications. It was assumed that the experience could be made equitable to a face-to-face interaction. However, with previous champions of video communications decreasing their reliance upon the technology (The Open University, 2013) perhaps the question “why” should have been more obvious.

The study aimed to establish the feasibility, purpose and role, and difference between face-to-face and video-based dialogue. In support of earlier work investigating student support via video link (Abbot et al., 1993; Berger, 2009; Collins et al., 1999), project findings indicated the majority of participants found using the medium discomforting and expressed a preference for face-to-face interaction. In particular participants raised concerns over use of the medium for the support of failing placements (where the student is at risk of failing the placement assessment), highlighting the emotive nature of such dialogue (Taylor, 2012). Participant responses, and the concerns raised highlighted the complexity of individual need impacting upon technological implementation. Combined with exploration of wide ranging theoretical influences, from communications theory, to psychology and sociology, the breadth of influencing factors became clear. This article aims to conceptualise the diversity of theoretical influences impacting upon individuals’ perceptions of video-based communications technologies (as illustrated in Figure 1). Whilst originally centred in Physiotherapy, the complexities associated with applying this technology are felt to be equally relevant to wider contexts and technologies.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 6: 2 Issues (2019)
Volume 5: 2 Issues (2018)
Volume 4: 2 Issues (2017)
Volume 3: 2 Issues (2016)
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2015)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (2014)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing