Constrained Cube Lattices for Multidimensional Database Mining

Constrained Cube Lattices for Multidimensional Database Mining

Alain Casali, Sébastien Nedjar, Rosine Cicchetti, Lotfi Lakhal
Copyright: © 2010 |Pages: 30
DOI: 10.4018/jdwm.2010070104
(Individual Articles)
No Current Special Offers


In multidimensional database mining, constrained multidimensional patterns differ from the well-known frequent patterns from both conceptual and log­ical points of view because of a common structure and the ability to support various types of constraints. Classical data mining techniques are based on the power set lattice of binary attribute values and, even adapted, are not suitable when addressing the discovery of constrained multidimen­sional patterns. In this paper, the authors propose a foundation for various multidimensional database mining problems by introducing a new algebraic struc­ture called cube lattice, which characterizes the search space to be explored. This paper takes into consideration monotone and/or anti-monotone constraints en­forced when mining multidimensional patterns. The authors propose condensed representations of the constrained cube lattice, which is a convex space, and present a generalized levelwise algorithm for computing them. Additionally, the authors consider the formalization of existing data cubes, and the discovery of frequent multidimensional patterns, while introducing a perfect concise representation from which any solution provided with its conjunction, disjunction and negation frequencies. Fi­nally, emphasis on advantages of the cube lattice when compared to the power set lattice of binary attributes in multidimensional database mining are placed.
Article Preview

Introduction And Motivations

The extraction of constrained multidimensional patterns in the area of multidimensional database mining (OLAP database mining or data mining from categorical database relations) is achieved for solving various problems such as discovering multidimensional association rules (Lu, Feng, & Han, 2000), Roll-Up dependencies (Calders, Ng, & Wijsen, 2002), multidimensional constrained gradients (Dong et al., 2004), closed constrained gradients (Wang, Han, & Pei, 2006), classification rules (Liu, Hsu, & Ma, 1998; Li, Han, & Pei, 2001), correlation rules (Brin, Motwani, & Silverstein, 1997; Grahne, Lakshmanan, & Wang, 2000), datacube (Gray et al., 1997; Beyer & Ramakrishnan, 1999; Han, Pei, Dong, & Wang, 2001; Xin, Han, Li, & Wah, 2003), iceberg cube (Beyer & Ramakrishnan, 1999; Han et al., 2001), emerging cube (Nedjar, Casali, Cicchetti, & Lakhal, 2007; Casali, Nedjar, Cicchetti, & Lakhal, 2009b), quotient cube (Lakshmanan, Pei, & Han, 2002), and closed cube (Casali, Cicchetti, & Lakhal, 2003b; Li & Wang, 2005; Xin, Shao, Han, & Liu, 2006; Casali, Nedjar, Cicchetti, & Lakhal, 2009a). We believe that a precise semantics is required for characterizing the search space and solving these multidimensional data mining problems. Such semantics can be captured through an algebraic structure, the cube lattice, provided with a similar expression power than the power set lattice, which is used for binary database min­ing (transaction database mining (Agrawal, Mannila, Srikant, Toivonen, & Verkamo, 1996)).

Adapting to this new multidimensional context, approaches and algorithms suc­cessfully used when mining binary databases (and thus using the power set lattice as a search space) is possible but not relevant. However, such adaptations have been frequently proposed for the extraction of quantitative association rules (Srikant & Agrawal, 1996) and for classification (Liu et al., 1998; Li et al., 2001). Moreover, (Beyer & Ramakrishnan, 1999; Han et al., 2001) have extended Apriori (Agrawal et al., 1996) for computing iceberg cubes and observed that such extensions “perform terribly”. Reasons behind these failures are the following. Firstly each multidimensional attribute must be replaced by a set of binary attributes, each of which representing a single value of the multidimensional attribute (Srikant & Agrawal, 1996). If the original attribute domains are large (which is the case in data warehouses (Beyer & Ramakrishnan, 1999)), the attribute substitution results in dealing with a great number of binary attributes (called items). On the other hand, the search space, considered when mining binary databases, is the lattice representing the power set of items. Nevertheless, this large search space encompasses a great number of solutions, which are known to be semantically erroneous in a multidimensional context. Let us suppose that in a relation the attribute A has k distinct values. It is replaced by k binary attributes a1,..., ak. In the powerset lattice, all the couples (ai,aj) with 1 ≤ i, j ≤ k and i ≠ j are considered and evaluating a constraint requires a costly memory space and a pass over the binary relation. But we know that the original data set does not contain any pattern (ai,aj), simply because the initial attribute A is atomic and thus its values ai and aj are exclusive.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 6 Issues (2023)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing