Cross-Cultural Educational Disparities Between China and North America Based on Science and Technology Revolutions

Cross-Cultural Educational Disparities Between China and North America Based on Science and Technology Revolutions

Bin Hu, Ifrah Malik, Muhammad Irshad, Sohail M. Noman, Ghadeer W. Khader, Aparna Murthy
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 14
DOI: 10.4018/IJISSS.313924
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Cultural disparities in the educational process are being examined as science and technology rapidly change, as well as large-scale transformations in the economy. Support in the form of funds is being given to graduate education in Canada. In contrast, China began a little later but has also been focusing on education. As a result, the comparison focuses on similarities and differences. The authors examine and contrast the differences in the educational processes across history to see if there are any common threads. One of the most fundamental differences is the assessment dynamics that have molded the beliefs and processes that are used on various scales. When talking about assessment culture, the authors are talking about how it may help students learn and succeed. However, despite the high levels of migration across nations like China, the United States, and Canada, little is known about the variety of evaluation methods kids encounter as they migrate from one environment to another.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

There has been an increase in the number of students migrating to and from the east and west (Boca & Saraçlı, 2019). There are numerous aspects that affect educational practices and methods that are important indicators of educational performance and achievement. To measure an overseas student's progress, we look at things like how well they communicate with their peers and how well they master the English language (Hu et al., 2021). There is an increasing focus on student achievement since it is seen as a critical influence on the direction of the educational process. Students' use of aggressive behavior is on the rise across all levels of higher education. The use of weapons, bad behavior, and even murder have occurred often on college campuses. Violence among young people, particularly among university students, has become a major problem around the world (Abasiubong et al., 2011). Students' aggressive behavior is seen as a sign of a more aggressive society because the university campus is a microcosm of society as a whole. As a result, academics are paying close attention to this topic and treating it seriously (T Tang et al., 2020).

Numerous psychological and criminological factors have been implicated in research on the causes of violence. The violent behavior was attributed to medical causes, psychological causes, and social hostility (Lochman & Dodge, 1998). As a result of violence, various studies have predicted school dropout and substance misuse (Broidy et al., 2003), which may have ramifications for physical and mental health, academic failures and communication difficulties (Heilbron et al., 2008). Western education has grown fast since World War II (Haider et al., 2021; Hu et al., 2020; Mustajar Ahmad Shah et al., 2021). Reason for this is that science and technology, both at home and abroad, are changing at such a quick pace We compare the educational systems in Canada and China. The present and future state of graduate education, as well as issues like training, are being examined.

As a result of massive government investment and a variety of economic security measures, Canada's educational system has undergone a radical transformation. At universities, graduate education places a higher value on the objectives and training goals associated with scientific research (Fullan & Rincon-Gallardo, 2016). Canadian graduate schools work closely with government and business to tailor their programs to the country's specific requirements and interests. After decades of growth, Canada has emerged as a global leader in graduate education. There has been an increase in the number of students moving between China, the United States, and Canada over the previous two decades (Gümüş et al., 2019). When it comes to transferring between states, a teacher-centered approach has proven to be a big impediment. Sociocultural environments are recognized to have varying levels of assessment discrepancy and barriers to full inclusion for students. To succeed, students must adapt to new ways of thinking and travel between educational environments. Students' ability to move between schools is heavily influenced by their grades. Grades are important since they are utilized for a variety of purposes, including student support, mobilization, and international admittance.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2022): 3 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing