Effectiveness of Online Advising on Honors Student Retention and Engagement

Effectiveness of Online Advising on Honors Student Retention and Engagement

Monica VanDieren
DOI: 10.4018/IJICTE.2016040105
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Academic advising is an important component of a student's education, and more often universities are turning to technology to aid in this task. This paper presents a case study of an online advising system that complements a university degree audit system by providing honors students and advisors up-to-date details on individual progress towards completing the honors curriculum and on the level of engagement in the honors co-curricular programming. By leveraging the features of Google Apps for Education, this advising system allows faculty and students to securely and easily access accurate information during schedule planning, and frees up honors staff from repetitive tasks allowing them to dedicate more time to helping students plan their educational journey. Effectiveness of this new system is measured by accuracy of information, time spent by the administration in maintaining the system, student retention and completion of the honors curriculum, and student engagement in honors co-curricular programming. The Google Script described in this paper can be adapted for mail-merge and automatic web page generation in several educational settings beyond academic advising.
Article Preview
Top

Literature Review

Cloud Computing in Education and FERPA

Since 2006 when Google announced its Google Apps for Education Edition, many universities began exploring “software-as-a-service” (SaaS) cloud-based tools such as email, calendars, and document creation and sharing (Gray, 2010; Katz, Goldstein, Yanosky, & Rushlo, 2010; Mutkoski, 2014). In 2015, the Google Apps for Education website claims over 40 million student-, teacher-, and administrator-users.

With the increased reliance of educational institutions on cloud computing such as Google Apps for Education, The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is a concern. In a guide for school administrators and legal counsel on cloud computing, Mutkowski (p. 521, 2014) writes:

We can see from the [Department of Education] guidance that many new technologies are likely to result in the storage or transmission of information that will be considered an education record under FERPA. It may be prudent for school policy to include a presumption that all data created by students, teachers, and staff be considered education records for purposes of directing third party technology providers as to how they should handle the data, how they can use it, and with whom they can share it.

The Google Apps for Education Compliance (n.d.) website maintains that “Google Apps for Education complies with the U.S. Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), and our commitment to do so is included in our agreements.”

In this paper we discuss an example of how small or decentralized units within a university can leverage SaaS products similar to Google Apps to improve administration, bookkeeping, and communication. In the past, these units may have had to sit low on prioritization lists waiting for their internal IT departments to create unit-specific applications. Now, these applications can be created in-house using features such as Google Scripts. Our example concerns tracking and communicating honors course completion and student engagement in the advising process.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 18: 3 Issues (2022)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing