Empirical Comparative Study of Wearable Service Trust Based on User Clustering

Empirical Comparative Study of Wearable Service Trust Based on User Clustering

Zhongwei Gu, Hongjun Xiong, Wei Hu
Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 16
DOI: 10.4018/JOEUC.20211101.oa18
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

Users of wearable services are different in age, occupation, income, education, personality, values and lifestyle, which also determine their different consumption patterns. Therefore, for the trust of wearable services, the influencing factors or strength may not be the same for different users. This article starts with the resource and motivation dimensions of VALSTM model, and the clustering model and questionnaire scale for consumers of wearable services were constructed. And then the users and potential users of wearable service are clustered by an improved clustering algorithm based on adaptive chaotic particle swarm optimization. Through clustering analysis of 535 valid questionnaires, users are grouped into three types of consumers with different lifestyles, respectively named: trend-following users, fashion-leading users and economic-rational users. Finally, this paper analyzes and compares the trust subgroup models of three clusters, and draws some conclusions.
Article Preview
Top

2. Clustering Model Design

To conduct clustering analysis of wearable service consumers, a clustering model of wearable service consumers should be constructed first, including the model's constituent elements (clustering variables) and the relationship between elements (model structure).

2.1 Clustering Variables

The traditional user clustering or market segmentation variables are mainly based on demographic characteristics, but this method has great limitations, and cannot accurately classify user groups, let alone effectively predict customer behavior. Since the 1970s, many scholars and experts began to use psychological characteristics to study consumer behavior and user segmentation, among which the more important method is based on consumer “lifestyle”. Lifestyle is measured mainly by using the mental map method. The research on the application of mental maps mainly includes the VALS (Values and Life Style Survey) method, which is currently popular, and the modified VALSTM (Dale et al., 2011) methods.

According to the previous research results of experts on individual psychological characteristics (Wang et al., 2013; Wayne et al., 2010; Luo et al., 2007) and VALSTM, the variables of the clustering model of wearable service consumers in this paper come from two dimensions: the horizontal dimension is the resource dimension and the vertical dimension is the motivation dimension, which are as follows:

Resource Dimension

Demographic variables: gender, age, education, occupation, income

Personality characteristics: (a) Ability: Energy, intelligence, leadership; (b) Personality: curiosity, self-confidence, impulse

Motivation Dimension

It can be divided into three motivations: ideal motivation, achievement motivation and self-expression motivation.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 36: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 35: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 34: 10 Issues (2022)
Volume 33: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 1: 3 Issues (1989)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing