Evaluating the Impact of DDoS Attacks in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks

Evaluating the Impact of DDoS Attacks in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks

Kaushik Adhikary (I. K. Gujral Punjab Technical University, Kapurthala, India), Shashi Bhushan (Chandigarh Engineering College, India), Sunil Kumar (Maharaja Agrasen University, India) and Kamlesh Dutta (National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, India)
DOI: 10.4018/IJSPPC.2020100101
OnDemand PDF Download:
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The presence of either malicious vehicles or inaccessibility of network services makes vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs) easy targets for denial of service (DoS) attacks. The sole purpose of DoS attacks is to prevent the intended users from accessing the available resources and services. When the DoS attack is carried out by multiple vehicles distributed throughout the network, it is referred as distributed DoS (DDoS) attack. A lot of works have been done by researchers in securing the vehicular communication against the DDoS attacks. In this paper, efforts have been made to simulate the DDoS attacks in VANETs as well as to study their impact on the performance of networks. The experimental results are presented using six important metrics, which are collision, jitter, delay, packet drop, ratio-in-out, and throughput. The experimental results show that the impact of distributed DoS (DDoS) attack on networks performance is very critical and must be addressed to ensure the smooth functioning of networks.
Article Preview
Top

A lot of works have been done by researchers in securing the vehicular communication against the DDoS attacks(Liu, Liu, Sun, Zhao, & You, 2018; Maheshwari, Krishna, & Brahma, 2014; Poongodi & Bose, 2015; Rampaul, Patial, & Kumar, 2016; Rupareliya, Vithlani, & Gohel, 2016), (Ali, Hassan, & Li, 2019; Arif, Wang, Zakirul Alam Bhuiyan, Wang, & Chen, 2019; Mokhtar & Azab, 2015; Samara, Al-Salihy, & Sures, n.d.; Shringar Raw, Kumar, & Singh, 2013; Vakil et al., 2012).The security resolutions for VANETs involve two main modules (Kumar & Dutta, 2016):

Preventions based on cryptography Techniques: Though, these methods are not much successful from protecting the network from the internal attacks when the malicious vehicles have the legal encryption and decryption keys and can use them for miscellaneous actions.

Detection based on intrusion detection system (IDS): Here, the detection mechanism is used as a next method of defense. The main goal of IDS is to hold abnormal activities in the action before they carry out the real damage to resources. Some of the examples include watchdogs (Rupareliya et al., 2016), bloom filters (Verma, Hasbullah, & Kumar, 2013) etc.

Hubaux et. al (Hubaux, Čapkun, & Luo, 2004) discussed the different vulnerabilities in smart vehicles. The authors also identified DoS attacks as the most dangerous types of attacks. According to the authors, there was no technical solution to address this problem at the time.

Raya et. al (Raya & Hubaux, 2005) discussed why vehicle networks need to be secured. They also proposed a security architecture with public key cryptography to protect VANET's privacy. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this document was the first attempt to address the safety of VANETs.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2021): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2020)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing