Exploring Contextual Factors of User E-Commerce Adoption During Coronavirus

Exploring Contextual Factors of User E-Commerce Adoption During Coronavirus

Manal Y. Alduaij, Mariam A. Alterkait
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 15
DOI: 10.4018/IJTD.304382
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Due to the intense impact coronavirus has placed on businesses the study examines the effect of the pandemic on e-commerce adoption. The Purpose study is to explore user’s contextual factors and its effect on user fears, experience, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and intention to use e-commerce during coronavirus. some users faced fears and hesitation to transition to e-commerce platforms from different segments of society. The study used a quantitative approach based on an electronically generated and distributed questionnaire to 402 participants.this research employed the TAM to examine user’s adoption of e-commerce amidst the pandemic. In terms of gender, results show females have greater fear than males when using e-commerce. Males feel greater perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), and have gained a better experience than females when using e-commerce. In terms of age, participants 35 years and above gained a better experience
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

In late 2019, due to the Covid-19 (Coronavirus) pandemic, the global economy faced a severe downfall. This also affected the entrepreneurial marketing decisions intensely because the pandemic indirectly impacted various social issues like import and export delays, shared price downfall, and food crises (Bhattacharjeea & Jahanshahi, 2020; Jahanshahi et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). The pandemic also provoked production breaks in many manufacturing companies throughout the world. Businesses struggled to adopt and adapt in times of crisis times to maintain their profit and existence in the markets. This left businesses with the only choice to sell their products and services to customers through e-commerce platforms (Fan et al., 2020). Some businesses managed to build e-commerce platforms while others, limited in resources, faced tremendous challenges. Businesses raced against time to build e-commerce platforms and transform their business activities into remote work, and users shopped online during the pandemic (Jahanshahi et al., 2020). The rapid transition from traditional to online shops was a challenge for companies and individuals (Fisher et al., 2020; Mohmmed et al., 2020).

With the recent spread of the pandemic, consumers’ shopping behaviors have been widely affected, and economies have been hit hard. This has been specifically witnessed in the rapid shift of consumer buying behavior driven by strict government quarantine regulations to slow the spread of Coronavirus. The population was divided between users of e-commerce and people that feared using e-commerce and resisted the use of the internet to continue their daily duties during the pandemic. In addition, there is limited literature on user fear when using e-commerce, especially during the pandemic. This research addresses such problems to understand users’ fears and experiences when using e-commerce.

Research Objective

To explore the disturbance the pandemic has had on individuals and the economy, the paper examines three main points:

  • The effect of the pandemic on users’ adoption of e-commerce.

  • Test the TAM model in relation to users’ e-commerce adoption during the pandemic.

  • User fears, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and experience of e-commerce, with respect to gender, age, education, and area of living.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing