Exploring Data Veracity Management in a Post-Truth Business Environment: An Integrative Literature Review and Future Research Direction

Exploring Data Veracity Management in a Post-Truth Business Environment: An Integrative Literature Review and Future Research Direction

Putra Endi Catyanadika (RMIT University, Australia), Alvedi Sabani (RMIT University, Australia), and Mark A. A. M. Leenders (RMIT University, Australia)
Copyright: © 2024 |Pages: 46
DOI: 10.4018/JDM.361726
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

With the ever-increasing volume and variety of data generated, organisations have to ensure their truthfulness and reliability. This paper provides overview of current research on managing data veracity in a business environment where misinformation is growing. A literature analysis from 2002 to 2023 identified three major themes: methods for ensuring data validity, data processing and optimisation, and data veracity in sustainability performance. In addition, the study highlights the gaps in the current research and proposes future research directions to help develop a better understanding of the themes and organisational implications. The study concludes that data veracity is crucial for future organisational research. Nevertheless, further work is required to refine the definition of data veracity to incorporate ‘truthfulness' better, understand human capabilities to support it, examine firms' governance of truthfulness and measure data veracity for social impact. The implications of these findings for data management and the development of relevant theories are discussed.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

In recent years, there has been unprecedented growth in globally generated data. The rapid development of information technology, IoT, and data-driven organizations has accelerated the reliance on data for daily business operations (Parviainen et al., 2017; Sawadogo & Darmont, 2021). The advancement of information technology hastens the process of acquiring, storing, organizing, sharing, and visualizing data in diverse formats, which increases its volume, velocity, and variety (Cappa et al., 2021). In fact, data growth worldwide, which reached 33 zettabytes in 2018, is projected to reach 125 zettabytes in 2025, with an estimated 40% growth annually (Tang et al., 2020). Consequently, the increasing demand for systems, tools, capabilities, and storage to manage data has resulted in a projected global market value exceeding US$203 billion. This indicates the substantial growth in data that is reshaping the business landscape (Tao et al., 2019).

The prevalence of data sharing has significantly influenced how data is accessed and used, presenting both benefits and risks for organizations. The integrity and accuracy of data have become increasingly important as businesses rely on data for decision-making processes. However, the ease of large-scale data generation and sharing, primarily through social media and fake news, has raised concerns about its credibility and quality. Several studies highlight the prevalence of misinformation and data manipulation on social media platforms, severely compromising the accuracy of available information (Conroy et al., 2015; Nakov & Da San Martino, 2021). The emergence of the filter bubble effect, wherein information is selectively presented to suit specific objectives, further exacerbates the distortion of reality and the dissemination of biased content (Amrollahi, 2021).

Post-truth society has emerged in political sciences, referring to the widespread concern about disputes over public truth claims (Suiter, 2016). The term even received the Oxford Word of the Year status from Oxford University Press in the context of Brexit and the Trump election in 2016. The implications for data collection and management are profound. Therefore, the goal of this research is to explore the body of knowledge regarding data veracity in this context.

Businesses tend to outsource their data collection processes as a cost-cutting measure (Hamlen & Thuraisingham, 2013). While this approach provides financial benefits, it introduces uncertainty regarding the accuracy and quality of the data obtained from third-party vendors. Cohen (2017) highlighted the risk of inaccurate data when vendors cannot guarantee its accuracy, potentially resulting in flawed decision-making. In addition to accuracy concerns, sharing information with external parties poses significant risks to data security. Potential data breaches and unauthorized access can compromise the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive information (Hamlen & Thuraisingham, 2013; Pandey et al., 2020). These risks are compounded by the rapid spread of fake news and other forms of deceptive information, which distorts understanding and undermines the accuracy of data analytics. Thus, there is an increasing need to develop robust measures to combat data deception and fake news while navigating the complex, data-driven business world.

Recognizing proper data quality and management systems has changed our understanding of data management and its essential characteristics. Big data is characterized by increased data volume, velocity, and variety, necessitating data veracity to yield valuable insights (Geerts & O’Leary, 2022; Ghasemaghaei, 2021; Rubin & Lukoianova, 2014). The goal of veracity is to extract maximum value from data processing by maintaining the accuracy, credibility, and reliability of the data (Rubin & Lukoianova, 2014). Increasing and preserving data veracity can be achieved through different approaches, including fact-checking or veracity assessment tools via data processing, continuous monitoring of data flow, or experts who can assess valuable information from big data (Cappa et al., 2021; García Lozano et al., 2020).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 36: 1 Issue (2025)
Volume 35: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 34: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 33: 5 Issues (2022): 4 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (1990)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing