Fitness Functions for Forward Selection: Application in Seven Data Sets

Fitness Functions for Forward Selection: Application in Seven Data Sets

Zhibin Liang (Wuhan University, Wuhan, China), Liguang Lou (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China) and Junjun Liu (Wuhan University, Wuhan, China)
DOI: 10.4018/IJQSPR.2019100105
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


Feature selection (FS) is an important part of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) research. Fitness function is an important factor in FS. Adjusted r2 (r2adj) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) are two commonly used fitness functions. Four fitness function, RIC1, RIC2, RIC3 and RIC4 based on the maximization of a ratio of r2adj and AIC are proposed here. A Forward Selection method based on the fitness function was applied to QSAR modelling study of 7 datasets with more than ten thousand samples in total, which was compared with the Forward Selection method based on three other fitness functions (r2adj, AIC and BIC). Final multilinear models were obtained, and 16 performance tests were carried out. Among the 16 performance tests of all the models, the RIC2 model had 3 indexes, which are the best, and there were no worst indicators. The results show that the RIC2 model is suitable for prediction.
Article Preview


Quantitative structure-activity/property relationship (QSAR/ QSPR) is a computational methodology for discerning the linkage between chemical structures of investigated compounds with their respective biological activity/chemical property. This is achieved by learning the inherent patterns hidden within the data set of interest by employing traditional and machine learning techniques. Predictive QSAR/QSPR modelling has been successfully employed to investigate a myriad of biological activities (Nantasenamat, Worachartcheewan, Prachayasittikul, Isarankuranaayudhya, & Prachayasittikul, 2013; Worachartcheewan, Nantasenamat, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya, & Prachayasittikul, 2013) and chemical properties (Chanin, Thanakorn, & Virapong, 2007; Lapins et al., 2013; Nantasenamat, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya, Tansila, Naenna, & Prachayasittikul, 2010; Nantasenamat, Naenna, & Prachayasittikul, 2005; Nantasenamat, Srungboonmee, Jamsak, Tansila, & Prachayasittikul, 2013). A more in-depth coverage on the concepts of QSAR/QSPR can be found in previous review article (Chanin & Virapong, 2010).

The progress in the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) approaches has been increasing in the recent years due to the fast-developing field of chemometrics (Neely, Madihally, & Gasem, 2010). As an example, utilization of feature (descriptor) selection (FS) has become a necessity in many QSAR studies (Martin, Ulf, Scott, & Lars, 2014; Shukla et al., 2014). FS removes such calculated descriptors that are redundant, noisy, or irrelevant to the target property at hand without loss of important information (Goodarzi, Dejaegher, & Vander, 2012; Shahlaei, 2013). FS helps in constructing robust and reliable QSPR models that are free from overfitting, a major QSAR model flaw taking place due to the use of a large number of descriptors relative to the training set data points. In this case, the model becomes tailored to fit the training set data and with low predictive ability on the unseen data points (test set).

FS has drawn the attention of researchers since the 1970s (Toussaint, 2006) and has been an important sub-area in data mining (Dietterich, 1997; Guyon, 2003). At present, FS has been widely applied to QSAR modelling (Goodarzi et al., 2012). Liu and Yu (Liu & Yu, 2005) defined the FS as a process of selecting a subset from a set of original features, and the subset’s optimality is measured by an evaluation strategy. The literature (Hocking & R., 1976) reviewed the problems of FS and variable analysis in linear regression. FS includes two aspects, which are fitness function and FS method. In the field of FS, the current research focuses on FS methods (Moghadam, Rahgozar, & Gharaghani, 2016; Ponzoni et al., 2017; Xia et al., 2018), but seldom on fitness function.

Which fitness function should be used depends on the purpose of the research. The three common roles of regression models are structural analysis, control and prediction. If the researchers want to do structural analysis through a regression model, the fitness function of adjusted-r2 (r2adj) can be considered in feature selection, so that the regression equation retains more independent variables. If the purpose of the regression equation is to be used for control, the fitness function of Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) (Posada & Buckley, 2004) should be used, which can reduce the estimation standard error of regression parameters by simplifying the model.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Open Access Articles
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 3: 2 Issues (2018)
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2017)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (2016)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing