Geographies of Open Source Biotechnology Innovation: Buzz, Pipelines, and Proximity in a Virtual Cluster

Geographies of Open Source Biotechnology Innovation: Buzz, Pipelines, and Proximity in a Virtual Cluster

David Tamoschus (Bayer Business Services, Germany)
Copyright: © 2012 |Pages: 19
DOI: 10.4018/ijkbo.2012040102
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

Virtual communication forms play an increasingly important role for innovation and knowledge creation to individuals and to public and private organizations such as research centers, universities, and firms. Whereas biotech R&D cooperation was characteristically organized in a highly specialized cluster based largely on local face-to-face communications and strategic temporary linkages to other agglomerations, this archetypal configuration may undergo changes due to the emerging applicability of open innovation models such as ‘open source biotechnology’ or the advanced integration of physicians and patients into therapy development processes. An in-depth case study of an ‘Open Source Pharma’ network portrays how innovation and knowledge integration mechanisms are put into practice through ´permanence` in virtual space. In this newly created environment a number of geographical patterns are inverted: ´local buzz` turns into ´virtual global buzz`; global pipelines transform to local pipelines. However, institutionalized norms of the virtual network illustrate noteworthy similarities with ´localized capabilities` of regional agglomerations.
Article Preview

Introduction

The study explores innovation practices in a virtual organization model in the field of biotechnology from a spatial perspective and demonstrates how an online-based biotech research network turns out as knowledge architect among various individuals, research centers, and universities. The study is theoretically based on cluster research revealing that, in the past decades, biotech R&D cooperation was typically organized in specialized agglomerations (Link & Rees, 1990) consisting of strong local ties (Audretsch & Stephan, 1996), top universities (Niosi & Bas, 2001), and local political and institutional embeddedness (Kaiser, 2008). Moreover temporary external linkages (Torre, 2008) served as ´global pipelines` supporting innovations (Owen-Smith & Powell, 2004; Bathelt, Maskell, & Malmberg, 2002), and avoiding lock-in effects (Grabher, 1993) and overembeddedness (Uzzi, 1997).

However, in recent years, spatially rather unstable and de-territorialized organizations such as project networks (Sydow & Staber, 2002) and project ecologies (Grabher, 2002, 2004) have been studied through network approaches. The fact that geographical proximity is not necessarily a precondition for successful knowledge transfer (Gallie, 2009) and that creation of knowledge is apparently possible through, often spatially disembedded, communities of practice (Brown & Duguid, 1991; Lave & Wenger, 1991) and through virtual communities of practice (Dube, Bourhis, & Jacob, 2005) raised strong interest to geographers, exploring economic interaction and the innovative and creative potential of communities in newly emerging space (Amin & Roberts, 2008). Most recently software’s ´open source`, ´permanently beta` (Neff & Stark, 2004), and the notions of ´open-` and ´user driven innovation` (Chesbrough, 2003; von Hippel, 1988, 1987; Hienerth, 2006) have been systemized into different organizational modes and user-categories distinguished by knowledge types and by behavioral, social, and geographical patterns such as physical and relational distance (Grabher, Ibert, & Flohr, 2008).

One of the latest movements for open innovation models are: the introduction of ´open source biotechnology` concepts (Hope, 2007; Maurer, 2008; Munos, 2006) and advanced ideas on the integration of physicians and patients into drug development processes (Demonaco, Ali, & von Hippel, 2006; Smits & Boon, 2008). Computational biotechnology in particular exposes high potential for open innovation thanks to analogies with software programming (Rai, 2005). These approaches appear as promising new business models but their spatial patterns, however, have so far basically been disregarded. Web 2.0 based interactions have transformed communication patterns and have created a new space which requires to be considered for practically all current and future business models. The study is an attempt to investigate an open innovation model in the field of biotechnology through geographical perspective by applying cluster theory.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2018): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2011)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing