Geospatial Resource Integration in Support of Homeland Defense and Security

Geospatial Resource Integration in Support of Homeland Defense and Security

David Foster (Cherokee Nation Technology Solutions (CNTS), San Antonio, TX, USA) and Christopher Mayfield (NORAD-NORTHCOM Command and Control, Peterson AFB, CO, USA & Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, San Diego, CA, USA)
Copyright: © 2016 |Pages: 11
DOI: 10.4018/IJAGR.2016100105
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has faced numerous challenges within the realm of Geospatial Information Systems and Science in fostering a Common Operational Picture suitable to homeland defense and security. This paper details the challenges and successes since September 11th, 2001 to build common ground for all federal, state, local governments, and non-government organizations that depend on geospatial data to provide for the safety and security of the Nation. An analysis of the protracted integration of commercial GIS technologies within the DoD and the speed, openness, and scale this expertise can bring is discussed as an issue for the Federal response to disasters. Finally, distinct successes of collaboration and integration of common standards and data currently in use at military commands is discussed as a robust path to improve future geospatial efforts.
Article Preview

Background And Evolution

The origins of contemporary use of geospatial technologies by more than a handful of specialists during crisis response can be traced to a small number of disasters as milestones. The main catalyst for the current United States Government geospatial cooperation, organization, capabilities and concepts was September 11th, 2001. Prior to this date, Federal and State organizations responsible for security of the country and disaster response insulated themselves from extensive collaboration and sharing with other agencies in order to protect information. Infamous domestic examples of poor collaboration as a contributor to pre and post event failures identified in the 9/11 Commission report include the 1993 World Trade Center and 1995 Oklahoma City bombings.

Geospatial technologies, although no longer in their infancy, were an expensive set of tools that a few specially trained employees used to create products at the discretion of their leadership. Sharing these geospatial products and data was not a compelling priority for many organizations. The 9/11 Commission Report identified the following as limited collaboration capacities within Federal agencies: Sharing information both internally and externally, insufficient training, inadequate resources, and perceived legal barriers to sharing data were issues that hindered the government’s response to disasters. Specifically, the 9/11 commission declared in 2004: “breaking the older mold of organization stovepipes within purely executive agencies, we propose a National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) that would borrow the joint, unified command concept adopted by the American military in a civilian agency, combining the joint intelligence function alongside the operations work.” Furthermore, the Commission proclaimed: “Secrecy stifles oversight, accountability and information sharing. Unfortunately, all the current organizational incentives encourage over classification. This balance should change…..The President should lead a government-wide effort to bring the major national security institutions into the information revolution, turning a mainframe into a decentralized network. “The obstacles are not technological.” (Brown 2011).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing