Article Preview
TopIntroduction
E-government is promoted as a means to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of public authorities as well as citizen satisfaction (Chadwick & May, 2003). As e-government channels generally have lower transactions costs than traditional channels, citizens’ migration from traditional channels towards e-government channels is regarded as key to achieving savings (The Danish Government, 2011). Literature reviews of the e-government field show that the papers studied lack practical recommendations on how to achieve these benefits (Heeks & Bailur, 2007; Hofmann, Räckers, & Becker, 2012; Madsen, Berger, & Phythian, 2014).
The channel choice (CC) branch of e-government examines how citizens and businesses choose communication channels in a public service encounter and how government organizations can migrate citizens towards the most efficient channels (Pieterson, 2010). The majority of CC and e-government adoption studies have been conducted in settings where citizens have a choice of channels, not in mandatory settings where citizens have already adopted e-government channels. Thus, the interplay between channels and the continued use of traditional channels among those who have adopted e-government channels remain unexplained (Madsen & Kræmmergaard, 2015; Reddick & Anthopoulos, 2014). Although a strategy to fully integrate government organizations’ channels has been suggested (Pieterson, 2010), it has remained theoretical. Conducting such a strategy in practice is complicated as the channels involved are often managed by several organizations. There is a lack of knowledge and practical recommendations for how such cross-organizational collaborations can be conducted (Kernaghan, 2013). We seek to address these gaps by answering the following research question; how can public authorities successfully implement a mandatory channel strategy, to increase citizens’ use of e-government channels and simultaneously reduce the use of traditional channels?
We present a longitudinal case study (Yin, 2014) of a cross-organizational collaboration surrounding a mandatory online self-service application. By conducting a study among a group of citizens who have largely adopted the e-government channel, we can analyze the multichannel government-to-citizen (G2C) interaction which occurs in a post-adoption environment and how government organizations carry out multichannel management (MCM) in such settings.
The next section contains a description of the case and the mandatory setting in which our study takes place. This is followed by a presentation of existing literature on channel choice to position the paper, illustrating the relevance of the research question and expected contributions. Then our method for data collection and analysis is presented, before turning to a discussion of our findings in relation to CC literature, and contributions to research and practioners. Finally, we offer concluding remarks, limitations, and recommendations for future studies.