Improving Recommendation Accuracy and Diversity via Multiple Social Factors and Social Circles

Improving Recommendation Accuracy and Diversity via Multiple Social Factors and Social Circles

Yong Feng (Key Laboratory of Dependable Service Computing in Cyber Physical Society, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, & College of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China), Heng Li (Key Laboratory of Dependable Service Computing in Cyber Physical Society, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, & College of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China) and Zhuo Chen (Key Laboratory of Dependable Service Computing in Cyber Physical Society, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, & College of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China)
Copyright: © 2014 |Pages: 15
DOI: 10.4018/IJWSR.2014100103
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

Recommender systems (RS) have been widely employed to suggest personalized online information to simplify user's information discovery process. With the popularity of online social networks, analysis and mining of social factors and social circles have been utilized to support more effective recommendations, but have not been fully investigated. In this paper, the authors propose a novel recommendation model with the consideration of more comprehensive social factors and topics that user is explicitly and implicitly interested in. Concretely, to further enhance recommendation accuracy, four social factors, individual preference, interpersonal trust influence, interpersonal interest similarity and interpersonal closeness degree, are simultaneously injected into our recommendation model based on probabilistic matrix factorization. Meanwhile, the authors explore several new methods to measure these social factors. Moreover, the authors infer explicit and implicit social circles to enhance the performance of recommendation diversity. Finally, the authors conduct a series of experiments on publicly available data. Experimental results show the proposed model achieves significantly improved performance (accuracy and diversity) over the existing models in which social information have not been fully considered.
Article Preview

1. Introduction

With the development of Web 2.0 technologies and the popularity of online social networks, Web/Internet has become a huge platform for information sharing. That more and more people like to share daily experiences in social networks leads to the explosive growth of data on the WWW. When users are able to define their information requirements precisely, search engine is a powerful tool to help them to select online information, e.g., Google, Yahoo, etc. However, in many cases, users have difficulty in precisely describing what information they want, the keyword-based search engine is not efficient to fully meet the need of user information discovery. Under the background of this, personalized recommender system, a more intelligent tool, is needed to offer users new ways to engage with the topics, events, and items that matter to them.

Recommender systems can be divided into several different types based on data source. Content-based RS work by learning the item content for the ranking problem. Recent content-based approaches rank candidate items based on how well they match the topic interest of the user as their preference (Balabanović & Shoham, 1997; Phelan, McCarthy, & Smyth, 2009; Stefanidis, Pitoura, & Vassiliadis, 2011). The accuracy of recommendations depends on the completeness and comprehensiveness of item content. Collaborative Filtering methods make recommendations by exploring user-item interaction information to find correlations between users or items (Koren, 2010; Liu, Chen, Xiong, Ding, & Chen, 2012; Peng, Zeng, Zhao, & Wang, 2010; Sarwar, Karypis, Konstan, & Riedl, 2001), but these methods are unable to make full use of user profiles and item content.

Now, social network has become an integral part of our daily lives. The massive social data contributed by social network users contains rich social knowledge. Researchers have proposed several social trust based RS to improve recommendation accuracy in recent years (Chen, Zeng, Zheng, & Chen, 2013; Jamali & Ester, 2010; Ma, King, & Lyu, 2009; Ma, Zhou, Liu, Lyu, & King, 2011). In fact, a user may trust different friends in different categories. With the notion of this, social circle based RS have recently been investigated (Feng & Qian, 2013; Yang, Steck, & Liu, 2012). Yang, Steck, and Liu (2012) introduced the concept of “inferred trust circle” for recommendation in social networks, taking interpersonal trust influence into account. They focused on inferring category-specific social trust circles. However, some of the social network users prefer choosing products closely related to their individual preference, rarely considering interpersonal influence. Feng and Qian (2013) proposed a recommendation model to cater users' individualities, especially for experienced users. Moreover, their approach not only takes individual preference into account, but also combines interpersonal trust influence and interpersonal interest similarity.

However, there are some general weaknesses in existing social circle based RS. On the one hand, interpersonal closeness degree, an important factor of social contextual based on the sociology studies, has not been considered in existing social circle based approaches, which leads to a limitation of recommendation accuracy. On the other hand, for each user, social circle based RS only offer recommendations in a subset of categories that he has rated in the past, which results in a lack of prediction diversity. For example, user focuses on Books category for a long time although he has no rating in this category, and hopes to get some recommendations. Unfortunately, the existing social circle based methods are unable to make rating predictions for in the non-rated Books category. Thus, further research is needed to overcome these weaknesses.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2018): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2004)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing