An Integrated Strategic Framework for E-Government Initiatives

An Integrated Strategic Framework for E-Government Initiatives

Fatemeh Saghafi (Iran Telecommunication Research Center, Iran), Behrouz Zarei (Tehran University, Iran), Akbar Kary Dolat Abadi (Shahid Sattari University, Iran) and Kolsoom Abbasi Shahkooh (Iran Telecommunication Research Center, Iran)
Copyright: © 2011 |Pages: 15
DOI: 10.4018/irmj.2011040101
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

The widespread applications of information and communication technologies have attracted many countries to e-government. Nonetheless, setting appropriate goals for e-government initiatives is an important factor for the success of these projects. This study provides a context-based framework for understanding e-government initiatives in different countries, including degree of e-government readiness, degree of transparency, and level of democratization. According to these determinants, 141 countries are categorized using Parson’s generic strategy of IT. Classification of countries in this framework shows significant correlations between these determinants and GDP index, which is an important outcome for country performance. This framework provides a roadmap for policymakers to formulate goals for their e-government initiatives commensurate with their respective environments.
Article Preview

Introduction

E-government is becoming an important public service concept for many countries in order to adapt with the modern environment. E-government has contributed to a great number of opportunities enhancing the government performance. It affects all of the government functions and private sectors and leads to new ways of interaction between citizens and government (Zarei, Ghapanchi, & Sattary, 2008). Numerous advantages have been reported for the e-government. For instance, it contributes to a more intelligent and agile government, with improved provision of services and a new instrument for the interaction between citizens and government (Sarantis, Charalabidis, & Askounis, 2011). Greater transparency, equality of access and confidence are some additional advantages of the e-government (Abbasi Shahkooh, Abbasi Shahkooh, & Abdollahi, 2008; Turban, King, Lee, Warkentin, & Chang, 2002).

E-government can be considered as a revolution based on the communion and partnership among all government stakeholders (Rowley, 2011) in which information and communications flow in a cyber space and increase the networking opportunities and organizational performance (Lowry, Albrecht, & Nunamaker, 2003). In fact, information technology based networks, transform the relations between people and government. Deployment of e-government enables the citizens, businesses, employees and other government agencies to access the government services and networks through a single portal and exchange information without time and space limitations (Institute for Trade Studies and Research, 2004). Governments all around the world, continuously put efforts to improve the customer services. Each country implements e-government for specific reasons which are different from other countries (Strejcek & Theil, 2004). Nevertheless, most governments face problems and difficulties in their legacy systems such as bureaucracy tendencies in administration and governance systems, centralized decision making schemes, complexity of reworks in public sector, lack of information sharing among the public agencies, and lack of efficient information and communications technology infrastructures (Altameem, Zairi, & Alshawi, 2006). With the huge investigations in e-government initiatives (Peters, Jansen, & Engers, 2004) governments are trying to attain this goal.

Governments all around the world compete to deploy and implement the e-government concept (theory) in their countries, however, studies show a great number of failures (Braa & Hedberg, 2000; Kitiyadisai, 2000). According to Heeks (2004), in developed countries, 35% of the e-government initiatives have completely failed, 50% have partially failed and only 15% were successful. The main reasons for these failures are the lack of an explicit strategy and inconsistency among the selected strategies.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2018): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1989)
Volume 1: 1 Issue (1988)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing