Intention-Behavior Gap in the Use of Personal Health Records (PHRs): Investigation of Social Determinants

Intention-Behavior Gap in the Use of Personal Health Records (PHRs): Investigation of Social Determinants

Younsook Yeo, Changsoo Sohn
Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 18
DOI: 10.4018/IJEA.2021010102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This paper examined an intention-behavior gap in individuals' personal health records (PHRs) adoption behaviors using Ajzen's theory of planned behavior (TPB) that incorporates social factors. Using structural equation modeling, the authors analyze the health information national trends survey data. The research found that all of the constructs, except for perceived behavioral control (PBC), shape intentions to use PHRs. However, PBC only predicts actual use. Individuals who have higher intentions tend to believe that healthcare providers should be able to share their patients' PHRs with other professionals and that scientists should be able to review de-identified patient PHRs. Individuals who perceive that a need exists for privacy control over their own health information tend to have higher intentions. The moderating social factors between intentions and actual behaviors are healthcare accessibility and being female, while education (positively) and employment (negatively) have significant relationships with actual use of, but not with intentions to use, PHRs. Future research needs to explicate why the moderating effect revolves around gender.
Article Preview
Top

2. Literature Review

2.1. Theory of Planned Behavior

TPB is a model that explains and predicts the factors influencing the intention to use, and actual use of technologies, proposed by Ajzen (1991). It is widely used to examine technology adoption behavior (e.g., Ajzen, 2011; Andrews et al., 2014; Bensley et al., 2004; Hsieh, 2015). The theory posits that individuals’ behavioral controls and intentions are strong predictors of their actual performance of the behavior (Ajzen, 1991). The theoretical constructs shaping individuals’ behavioral intentions in the TPB are (1) subjective norm [SN], (2) attitudes [ATT], and (3) perceived behavioral control [PBC]. According to Ajzen (1991), SN is a function of a normative belief to comply with the behavior (i.e., a perceived expectation of others regarding the behavior, which leads to feelings of pressure about whether to follow the perceived expectation of others) and thus, the person is motivated to comply with the behavior. ATT refers to a positive or negative response toward the normative belief. PBC is akin to Bandura’s self-efficacy—“judgments of how well one can execute courses of action required to deal with prospective situations” (Bandura, 1982, p. 122).

Prior studies have found that SN, ATT, and PBC have the predictive power for PHR adoption behavior. Specifically, SN toward ethical and privacy concerns in relation to PHRs was associated not only to intentional behavior (Abramson et al., 2014; Archer & Cocosila, 2014; Li et al., 2014; Patel et al., 2012; Vodicka et al., 2013), but also to actual behavior (Ancker et al., 2014; Ozoka et al., 2014). ATT toward PHRs predicted intentional (Andrews et al., 2014; Li et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2012; King et al., 2012) and actual behaviors (Ancker et al., 2014). PBC also did for intentional (Assadi & Hassanein, 2017; Dutta et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2009; Lober et al., 2006; Noblin et al., 2012) and actual behaviors (Lober et al., 2006; Noblin et al., 2012). However, none of these studies, except for Lober et al. and Noblin et al., have tested in a model both behavioral intentions and actual use from healthcare consumers’ perspective.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 16: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 15: 2 Issues (2023)
Volume 14: 3 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 13: 2 Issues (2021)
Volume 12: 2 Issues (2020)
Volume 11: 2 Issues (2019)
Volume 10: 2 Issues (2018)
Volume 9: 2 Issues (2017)
Volume 8: 2 Issues (2016)
Volume 7: 2 Issues (2015)
Volume 6: 2 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing