Investigation on Viewing Behaviors for Home Shopping Channels Using Large-Scale TV Log Data

Investigation on Viewing Behaviors for Home Shopping Channels Using Large-Scale TV Log Data

Kyoungok Kim
Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 15
DOI: 10.4018/IJKSS.291974
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In Korea, commissions from home-shopping channels are major sources of revenue for TV providers, but no research has been conducted to precisely understand TV viewing behaviors toward home-shopping channels, even though abundant works on TV advertising and channel-switching behaviors during commercial breaks can be found. Accordingly, this study aimed to discover characteristic TV viewing behaviors, especially for home-shopping channels. To understand when and how viewers watch home-shopping channels, this study used two different approaches. First, this study analyzed relationships among channels using word2vec to measure similarities between channels in terms of what channels were watched before and after watching these two channels. Second, this study aimed to investigate in detail the factors or contexts that induced home-shopping. As a result, the characteristics of TV viewing patterns related with home-shopping were found.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

Although Internet-based video content and social media have proliferated with the development of IT technologies, and television (TV)-viewing behaviors have changed with the popularization of mobile devices and services, such as YouTube, Netflix, and other video-on-demand (VOD) applications, watching TV remains a major leisure activity. The 2017 American Time Use Survey stated that TV viewing accounted for the majority of leisure time (2.8 h per day), accounting for just over half of all leisure time, on average (Source: American Time Use Survey provided in https://www.bls.gov/tus). In addition, although the time spent VOD viewing on TV screens has consistently increased, live and scheduled linear TV content still represents almost 80% of the total viewing time of viewers (Source: ERICSSON CONSUMERLAB TV and MEDIA 2017). As changes continue to occur, understanding TV viewing behaviors remains important.

The development of technology has also changed the methodology of investigating TV viewing patterns. Studies on TV viewing behavior have traditionally conducted using surveys and attempted to reveal the relationships between demographic characteristics and TV viewing behaviors (Anderson et al., 1986), how television viewers selected programs (Brosius et al., 1992), and commercial avoidance behaviors or the effects of TV advertising (Moriarty and Everett, 1994; L.C.M. et al., 2003). However, it is known that responses to questionnaires or self-reporting diaries can be highly unreliable, and surveys of this type require considerable time and cost to conduct, since they must involve a large number of respondents for reliable analysis.

Recently, Internet Protocol TV (IPTV), cable TV, and satellite TV providers have included log collection systems in set-top boxes to gather comprehensive information about their subscribers’ viewing activities. Log data are more accurate than survey data and self-reporting diaries and can provide detailed information regarding TV viewing behaviors.

Utilizing the rich information in the log data, studies to understand TV viewers’ behaviors in depth and detail have increased. Most studies on viewers’ behaviors and TV watching have analyzed channel-switching behaviors (Becker, 2016). Employing viewer behavior analysis can help increase an audience’s rate, serve as the basis for a recommendation system for channels or programs, and help profile viewers so that they can be provided personalized advertising and new product marketing (Abrahamsson and Nordmark, 2012; Iguchi et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2017). In addition, researchers have used the log data, especially for IPTV, to attempt to better understand TV viewing patterns and predict the next program, in order to mitigate zapping delay (Ramos et al., 2011; Ferro et al., 2016; Basicevic et al., 2018).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing