Lessons for Effective Government IT Outsourcing: Education and Immigration in New Zealand

Lessons for Effective Government IT Outsourcing: Education and Immigration in New Zealand

Scott Winnard
Copyright: © 2017 |Pages: 12
DOI: 10.4018/IJEGR.2017070105
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Information technology (IT) tends to be viewed as ancillary to core government functions. Consequently, IT is often outsourced to the private sector. Unfortunately, there is a long line of failed outsourced projects. This article uses two New Zealand case studies, the particularly public failure of the recent school payroll system and the successful introduction of electronic immigration processing, to examine how the design and governance of outsourced government IT projects could be improved. It concludes that an awareness of historic trends is important for project success, that governments need to be more active in combating market based transaction costs and that contract management becomes a core government competency when projects are outsourced. It also argues that better change management and cognisance of design-reality gaps would positively impact the outcomes of future projects.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

They've been overpaid, underpaid and not paid at all – now one teacher has been paid for being in two places at one time. (O’Callaghan, 2012)

That was the situation in November 2012. Three months earlier the New Zealand (NZ) Ministry of Education’s (the Ministry) new, outsourced school payroll systems – Novopay – went live. Novopay was, unfortunately, an immediate disaster. Payment errors occurred and the customer service function was underprepared and overwhelmed (Jack & Wevers, 2013). The Post Primary Teachers Association even took the Ministry to court for breaching its statutory obligations (Barback, 2013). Performance was so bad that eventually Ministerial responsibility was assigned to resolve the matter and the Ministry and Talent2 (the private provider) parted ways (Joyce, 2014; Key, 2013).

Information technology (IT) promises to provide governments with cost and time savings and with better service coordination and information management. It should also allow public services to be tailored to the needs of citizens (Oostveen, 2008). Government IT is often contracted out to the private sector. Contracting out, or outsourcing, is a core New Public Management principle used to introduce competition into the delivery of public services. Competition should, in theory, spur quality improvements and cost reductions. Additionally, outsourcing ancillary functions is said to allow government to focus on “core” public tasks. The outsourcing of IT systems has historically been justified by their being ancillary to core public functions (Dunleavy, 1994; Dunleavy, Margetts, Bastow, & Tinkler, 2006). Despite all this promise, the size, number and persistence of government IT failures are well documented (Controller and Auditor General, 2013; Gauld & Goldfinch, 2006; Oostveen, 2008; Small, 2000).

This paper examines how the design and governance of outsourced government IT projects might be improved. Three principal matters are tackled:

  • 1.

    Path dependence in public services and the need to be realistic about what history means for service delivery and contracting out;

  • 2.

    The importance of minimising transaction costs where the market is used to provide public services (or at least some public functions); and

  • 3.

    The changing role of government – from producer to manager – when service functions are outsourced.

This paper adds to the body of public sector IT case studies by unpicking Novopay’s failure in light of these matters. However, it also goes a step further and uses a comparative case study to place success alongside failure. SmartGate, the privately provided electronic passport control system used by the New Zealand Customs Agency (NZ Customs), is a recent example of a particularly successful outsourced government IT endeavour (Controller and Auditor-General of New Zealand, 2012). It provides a positive comparison throughout this paper. The intention is that by using comparative case studies and highlighting good practice (as well as bad) this paper will contribute to the existing literature in a constructive manner. It concludes by distilling five core principles that could contribute to the effectiveness of outsourced government IT projects.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing