Machine Learning Algorithms for Big Data Applications With Policy Implementation

Machine Learning Algorithms for Big Data Applications With Policy Implementation

Jianzu Wu (School of Management, Lanzhou University, China) and Kunxin Zhang (School of Management, Lanzhou University, China)
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 13
DOI: 10.4018/JOEUC.287570
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

This article examines the policy implementation literature using a text mining technique, known as a structural topic model (STM), to conduct a comprehensive analysis of 547 articles published by 11 major journals between 2000 and 2019. The subject analyzed was the policy implementation literature, and the search included titles, keywords, and abstracts. The application of the STM not only allowed us to provide snapshots of different research topics and variation across covariates but also let us track the evolution and influence of topics over time. Examining the policy implementation literature has contributed to the understanding of public policy areas; the authors also provided recommendations for future studies in policy implementation.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Policy implementation is a critical part of public policy, referred to as the process of carrying out an underlying policy decision, typically made in a statute (Sabatier & Mazmanian, 1980). Researchers have always paid much more attention to policy design and policy evaluation and less on how to implement these policies (Schofield, 2001). The first studies of implementation theory occurred in Oakland, California (Pressman & Wildavsky, 1984). Since then, there has been a rapid rise in the study of policy implementation. Previous work has focused on critical analysis or synthesis of different approaches (Sabatier, 1986). However, policy implementation research remains a niche area of interest.

Given that many studies of policy implementation provide evidence of the importance of implementation, the aim of this study was to further current knowledge of their rigidities. Based on selected published research, this research combines the application of the text mining technique with a structural topic model (STM) to provide a snapshot of policy implementation studies from January 2000 to July 2019 as well as incorporating information about the documents (Roberts et al., 2013). Within the literature analysis, we have tried to highlight the manifestation of the rigidities in policy implementation study development to facilitate future research (Moro et al., 2019). Furthermore, the STM could allow the researcher to discover topics from textual data without predicting them.

Text mining and topic modeling have been successfully used as a valuable tools in research on ethnic marketing (Moro et al., 2019) and cause-related marketing (Guerreiro et al., 2016). The generally accepted use of advanced text mining methodology could provide a comprehensive data-driven analysis of research (Liu et al., 2018). We chose unsupervised algorithms because we had no a priori expectations for categories of scholarly study, especially on topics some researchers might not have considered (Reich et al., 2014). The unsupervised learning model could help researchers analyze textual data without human intervention. Until now, this methodology has not been applied to the policy implementation literature. In this paper, we demonstrate policy implementation research using topic models instead of focusing on the technical details of the STM.

The main contributions of this study are as follows. First, we uncovered the prevalence and content of topics regarding policy implementation, based on text mining and the STM. Second, we explored the changing trends regarding the proportion of scholarly attention to different topics. Third, we evaluated the levels of scholarly impact by each topic. The rest of this paper is broken into four sections. The next section gives a brief overview of policy implementation, after which we outline text mining and an STM that includes covariates. We then present our results before, finally, drawing our conclusions for policy implementation research.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 34: 9 Issues (2022)
Volume 33: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 1: 3 Issues (1989)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing