Management Models for Business Incubators: A Systematic Review

Management Models for Business Incubators: A Systematic Review

Andreia de Bem Machado (Faculdade do Vale do Itajaí Mirim, Brazil), Araci Hack Catapan (Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil), and Maria José Sousa (ISCTE Instituto Universitario de Lisboa, Portugal)
Copyright: © 2020 |Pages: 12
DOI: 10.4018/IJTD.2020040103
OnDemand PDF Download:
Available
$29.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $29.50

Abstract

The primary goal of this research is to do a systematic review about management models for business incubators. Management models are grounded in three basic pillars: people, processes, and technologies. In this scenario, the business incubator management model is fundamental because it is important for business incubators to meet the demands of new entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship. Therefore, the objective of this research is to map the light of the systematic review of business incubator management models on the world stage. To do so, the methodology used was the integrative review of the literature using the Scopus database and regulations, international and national documents. As a result, one of the problems found in these models was that most business incubator management models describe a business incubator as a transformation mechanism, but do not spell out details about the incubation process or models and best practices for business incubators. management for the continuous improvement of incubated enterprises.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

The alternation in the economy is observed since the 1970s, where consecutive changes provided a model of socio-economic development characterized by a dynamic and competitive scenario. It is noticed that the internationalization of the economy has been heated by the technological development of the means of production, making them more efficient and productive, and the traditional production factors are being replaced by a new archetype.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, period of recession and oil crisis, the economic scenario was marked by market opening and a decrease in production activities. Thus, this decade is marked by an increase of competitiveness and productivity of the organizations but is also observed a scenario of recession and lack of job opportunities.

In Brazil, from the 1990s, there was a growth in economic development linked to policies based on the formation of a national innovation context, with greater attention given to small and medium business, as promoters in the generation of jobs and increase of income.

It can be seen that the capacity of innovation, initiated in Brazil in the 1990s, is related to the economic and social growth of the world. It is noted that economically developed countries disseminate the culture of entrepreneurship and innovation through interactions between universities, companies and government, three segments considered as agents of innovation (Leite & Moraes, 2016). In Brazil, a developing country, there is an urgent need for investment in technological innovation through the partnerships between the mentioned agents.

In order to provide such economic growth, it is necessary to boost the growth of innovative small and medium-sized business through their interactions with the public sector and also with universities. According to some authors (Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff, 2001; Sbragia et al., 2005; Clarim, Souza, & Januzzi, 2010), these exchanges take place within the context of the Technological Innovation Habitats (TIH).

Thus, it is considered that IHs are of great relevance for the development and regional economic growth, since they constitute the mediation of knowledge, productive practices and interactions between companies, universities and government agents. However, one of the great challenges of the innovation scenario is to create a structure for businesses to build the knowledge necessary for their growth and their stay in a competitive market (Al-Mubaraki, Muhammad and Busler, 2015). According to the Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação or MCTI (Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation), Brazil has a high mortality rate in the first four years of business existence compared to developed countries. The mortality rate reaches 59.9% (MCTI, 2014). The explanation is due to the fact that most Brazilian entrepreneurs are not prepared for the highly competitive market (Williams & Youssef, 2013). It is perceived that the companies are created by necessity not by opportunity to undertake, they are created many times by people who lost their jobs or even to increase their income (Gema, 2013). In this innovation scenario, we have the incubators that allow the establishment of businesses that are driven by education and may after the incubation period become startups (In this innovation scenario, we have the incubators that allow the establishment of businesses that are driven by education and may after the incubation period become startups (Hathaway,2016; Amaral, 2019).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing