Medical Image Fusion in Wavelet and Ridgelet Domains: A Comparative Evaluation

Medical Image Fusion in Wavelet and Ridgelet Domains: A Comparative Evaluation

Vikrant Bhateja (Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial Group of Professional Colleges, Lucknow (U.P.), India), Abhinav Krishn (Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial Group of Professional Colleges, Lucknow (U.P.), India), Himanshi Patel (Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial Group of Professional Colleges, Lucknow (U.P.), India) and Akanksha Sahu (Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial Group of Professional Colleges, Lucknow (U.P.), India)
Copyright: © 2015 |Pages: 14
DOI: 10.4018/IJRSDA.2015070105
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

Medical image fusion facilitates the retrieval of complementary information from medical images and has been employed diversely for computer-aided diagnosis of life threatening diseases. Fusion has been performed using various approaches such as Pyramidal, Multi-resolution, multi-scale etc. Each and every approach of fusion depicts only a particular feature (i.e. the information content or the structural properties of an image). Therefore, this paper presents a comparative analysis and evaluation of multi-modal medical image fusion methodologies employing wavelet as a multi-resolution approach and ridgelet as a multi-scale approach. The current work tends to highlight upon the utility of these approaches according to the requirement of features in the fused image. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based fusion algorithm has been employed in both ridgelet and wavelet domains for purpose of minimisation of redundancies. Simulations have been performed for different sets of MR and CT-scan images taken from ‘The Whole Brain Atlas'. The performance evaluation has been carried out using different parameters of image quality evaluation like: Entropy (E), Fusion Factor (FF), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) and Edge Strength (QFAB). The outcome of this analysis highlights the trade-off between the retrieval of information content and the morphological details in finally fused image in wavelet and ridgelet domains.
Article Preview

1. Introduction

1.1. Overview of Medical Image Fusion

‘Medical Image Fusion’ is the process of combining and merging complementary information into a single image from two or more source images to maximize the information content of images and minimize the distortion and artifacts in the resulting image (Dasarathy 2012). The complementary nature of medical imaging sensors of different modalities, (X-ray, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT)) have brought a great need of image fusion for the retrieval of relevant diagnostic information from medical images. The significance of fusion process is important for multimodal imaging modalities as images obtained from single modality provides only specific information; thus it is not feasible to get all the requisite information from image generated by single modality (Schoder et al. 2004; Nakamoto et al. 2009). To elaborate further, CT helps in accessing the extent of disease; yet it is limited in soft-tissue contrast, needed for differentiating tumors from scar tissues. On the other hand, MRI scores over CT in terms of soft tissue discrimination. This is necessary because the soft tissue contrast allows better visualization of tumors. This highlights the need towards the development of multimodality medical imaging sensors for extracting clinical information to explore the possibility of data reduction along with better visual representation. It is noteworthy here that the visualization of the region of interest can be further improved by application of non-linear contrast and edge enhancement techniques (Pandey et al., 2012, 2013; Bhateja et al., 2014).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2018): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2015)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (2014)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing