An Observation on Least Action Principle in Classical Mechanics Oriented on the Evaluation of Relativistic Error Concerning the Measurements of Light Propagating in a Liquid: Engineering Journal Article | IGI Global

×

Receive a 20% Discount on All Purchases Directly Through IGI Global's Online Bookstore

Create a Free IGI Global Library Account to Receive a 25% Discount on All Purchases

Exclusive benefits include one-click shopping, flexible payment options, free COUNTER 4 and MARC records, and a 25% discount on all titles as well as the award-winning InfoSci^{®}-Databases.

InfoSci^{®}-Journals Annual Subscription Price for New Customers: As Low As US$ 4,950

This collection of over 175 e-journals offers unlimited access to highly-cited, forward-thinking content in full-text PDF and XML with no DRM. There are no platform or maintenance fees and a guarantee of no more than 5% increase annually.

Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition (10 Volumes) Extended Offer

Receive the complimentary e-books for the first, second, and third editions with the purchase of the Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition e-book. Plus, take 20% off when purchasing directly through IGI Global's Online Bookstore.

Massaro, Alessandro and Piero Adriano Massaro. "An Observation on Least Action Principle in Classical Mechanics Oriented on the Evaluation of Relativistic Error Concerning the Measurements of Light Propagating in a Liquid." IJMTIE 1.3 (2011): 14-24. Web. 17 Mar. 2018. doi:10.4018/ijmtie.2011070102

APA

Massaro, A., & Massaro, P. A. (2011). An Observation on Least Action Principle in Classical Mechanics Oriented on the Evaluation of Relativistic Error Concerning the Measurements of Light Propagating in a Liquid. International Journal of Measurement Technologies and Instrumentation Engineering (IJMTIE), 1(3), 14-24. doi:10.4018/ijmtie.2011070102

Chicago

Massaro, Alessandro and Piero Adriano Massaro. "An Observation on Least Action Principle in Classical Mechanics Oriented on the Evaluation of Relativistic Error Concerning the Measurements of Light Propagating in a Liquid," International Journal of Measurement Technologies and Instrumentation Engineering (IJMTIE) 1 (2011): 3, accessed (March 17, 2018), doi:10.4018/ijmtie.2011070102

An Observation on Least Action Principle in Classical Mechanics Oriented on the Evaluation of Relativistic Error Concerning the Measurements of Light Propagating in a Liquid

Alessandro Massaro (Italian Institute of Technology, Italy) and Piero Adriano Massaro (University of Bari, Italy)

The authors prove that the standard least action principle implies a more general form of the same principle by which they can state generalized motion equation including the classical Euler equation as a particular case. This form is based on an observation regarding the last action principle about the limit case in the classical approach using symmetry violations. Furthermore the well known first integrals of the classical Euler equations become only approximate first integrals. The authors also prove a generalization of the fundamental lemma of the calculus of variation and we consider the application in electromagnetism.

Article Preview

2. The Action Functional In Different Sets Of Admissible Functions

Let us consider the action functional for a single particle moving along x-axis (1) where L(t,x,_{}) is the Lagrangian. If x(t) is the real physical curve described by the particle (trajectory), such that x(t_{1})=a, x(t_{2})=b, we consider the functional (1) in the following sets of admissible functions

(2)

Here D_{1}(t_{1},t_{2}) is the space of all functions defined on the interval [t_{1},t_{2}] which are continuous and have continuous first derivatives; h(t) is an arbitrary variable function, h_{0}(t) and h_{1}(t) are arbitrary but fixed functions; α is a real variable parameter. In Figure 1 is reported an example of x_{2}-trajectory.

Figure 1.

Example of the trajectory x_{2}(t,α)

The increment of action functional corresponding to the increment h(t) of x(t) is written as (3) where δS[x;h] is the differential of the functional and ε→0 for ||h||→0. The last action principle states that in the set Γ_{1} we have

(4)

We now observe that (δS^{(1)}[x]=0)→ (δS^{(2)}[x]=0)→ (δS^{(3)}[x]=0).

In fact an explicit form of the formula (4) can be derived by using the Taylor’s theorem. So we have (5) where the subscript denotes partial derivatives with respect to the corresponding arguments, and the dots denote terms of order higher than 1 relative to h and _{}_{.}

In this manner the formula (4) can be written as

(6)

By considering the action functional in the set Γ_{2} we have obviously

(7)

So we have

(8)

We can also prove the implication (9) by showing that (Gelfand et al., 1963)