Open Source Software Adaptation in Africa: Is a Matter of Inferior or Cheap is Not Quality?

Open Source Software Adaptation in Africa: Is a Matter of Inferior or Cheap is Not Quality?

Abubakar Diwani Bakar, Abu Bakar Md. Sultan, Hazura Zulzalil, Jamilah Din
Copyright: © 2014 |Pages: 15
DOI: 10.4018/ijossp.2014010101
(Individual Articles)
No Current Special Offers


The African continent has long benefited from adopting OSS in its private and public organizations that have changed their way of development, the use and how to acquire proprietary software. This frequency of adaptation does not appear to be in balance with the contribution to the OSS community. Using views from experienced software practitioners working in different organizations across two African countries it has been observed that neglected infrastructure, a wide availability of proprietary software and misconceptions of a clear meaning of Open Source Software across Africa have been an obstacle towards the participation in the OSS technology in the global network.
Article Preview


Recent developments in the software design, for many developing countries an open source has encountered proprietary software as one of the accepted alternative solution. African countries as part of the developing continent have changed their strategy in software adoption towards the use of open source solution by introducing policy advocating the use of the OSS in their institutions (Bruggink, 2003; Lewis, 2008). The free and open nature of this technology gives the practitioners room to enjoy the flavor of newly advanced technology through codes. Among other benefits that attract the widely adaptation of this technology is the availability of a large pool of developers who can easily debug and improve the software without borders (Dafara et al., 2000; Huett et al., 2010; Serone & Sowe, 2010; Ven & De Bruyn, 2011). Increase in adaptation rate, more practitioners from different part of the world dump a million of software products in the market.

In illustration, OSS technology is characterized by bazaar style, where practitioners from different parts of the world contribute to the single product at the unknown location (Raymond, 1998). Developers and other contributors commit the changes of software based on this kind of practice. Xu (2007) explained the OSS practice like social networking where interaction between developers from unknown geographical location made remarkable achievement in the software development. He added that one of the catalytic achievements is the commitment of developers in participating fully in the OSS community. Therefore the contribution from this group of technical people is the one that make product stable since the early release of the software is the outcome of grimy design.

As earlier studies concerned with the comparisons and contrast between OSS versus proprietary software (Bonaccorsi & Rossi, 2003; Paulson, 2004), there is a need of turning the side of the coin into the challenges and opportunities of OSS adoption in different contexts. In Africa, where the social economic barrier, imbalance of economic policies and lack of financial resources are the major problems due to more opportunities obtained in comparison with the challenges, OSS technology has triggered many of its countries to adopt it in their private and even in public organizations (Chonia, 2003; Dan et al., 2005; Morgan & Finnegan, 2007; Roza et al., 2011; Bakar et al., 2012). However, African practitioners seem to lead in downloading and installing the OSS rather than developing participation. According to the statistics collected by a FEDORA project survey by Chonia (2003) and a survey of five Africa countries by Bruggink (2003), the countries increased the adoption but still the continent in general is the least to be represented in contributions. This has raised concerns about the imbalance between adoption and the contribution to this fastest growing technology model.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 1 Issue (2015)
Volume 5: 3 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing